[2022] KEELRC 4075 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 4075 (KLR)

The court found that a notice of withdrawal dated June 7, 2022, had been filed by the applicant. Despite subsequent submissions by the applicant's advocate, the existence of the notice of withdrawal was determinative. The court therefore marked the matter as withdrawn, with no order as to costs, and closed the file....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 4075 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Geoffrey Nyakeriga Osiri; Respondent: Onda Mechanical E.A. Limited; Respondent: First Assurance Compnay Limited; Respondent: County Director of Occupational Safety & Health Services
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E157 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Appeal / Withdrawal Ruling
Outcome
withdrawn
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Appeal, Pleadings Nature, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Withdrawal of Appeal Pleadings Nature Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Nyakeriga Osiri

Applicant

Onda Mechanical E.A. Limited

Respondent

First Assurance Compnay Limited

Respondent

County Director of Occupational Safety & Health Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Appeal / Withdrawal Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the matter before the court is an appeal, miscellaneous application, or a cause.
  2. 2 Whether the notice of withdrawal filed by the applicant is effective and should be acted upon.
  3. 3 Whether any order as to costs should be made upon withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that a notice of withdrawal dated June 7, 2022, had been filed by the applicant. Despite subsequent submissions by the applicant's advocate, the existence of the notice of withdrawal was determinative. The court therefore marked the matter as withdrawn, with no order as to costs, and closed the file. The court also reiterated its earlier concern that the nature of the pleadings was unclear, but this became moot upon withdrawal.

Court Disposition

withdrawn

Orders

  • The matter is marked as withdrawn.
  • There is no order as to costs.