[2018] KEELC 3221 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3221 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in filing the record of appeal was satisfactorily explained by the applicant, citing the absence of an Environment and Land Court at Garissa and the time taken to obtain instructions from the client. The court held that the delay was not inordinate and did not cause prejudice to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3221 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Osman Abdi Irobe; Respondent: Nadhifa B. Abdisamad
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Garissa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 4 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Record of Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed; leave granted to file record of appeal out of time.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Record of Appeal Filing, Delay and Prejudice, Expeditious Resolution, Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeals From Subordinate Courts Record of Appeal Filing Delay and Prejudice Expeditious Resolution Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Osman Abdi Irobe

Appellant

Nadhifa B. Abdisamad

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Record of Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for failing to file the record of appeal within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the record of appeal is inordinate and prejudicial to the respondent.
  3. 3 Whether granting leave to file the record of appeal out of time serves the overriding objective of expeditious and just resolution of disputes.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the record of appeal was satisfactorily explained by the applicant, citing the absence of an Environment and Land Court at Garissa and the time taken to obtain instructions from the client. The court held that the delay was not inordinate and did not cause prejudice to the respondent, who did not oppose the application. The court further determined that granting leave would promote the just and expeditious determination of the dispute, in line with the overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Act. Consequently, the application for extension of time to file the record of appeal was allowed.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; leave granted to file record of appeal out of time.

Orders

  • The application dated 16th February, 2018 is allowed as prayed.
  • The applicant is granted leave to file the record of appeal out of time.