[2022] KEELRC 12728 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents' application dated 30th December 2020 was a repetition of a preliminary objection previously raised and determined by the court in its ruling of 19th January 2016, which dismissed the objection and ordered the claim to be heard on its merits. The court held that if the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 12728 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hassan Aden Osman; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary for Defence and Chairperson of Defence Council; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 32 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out Claim as Time Barred
- Outcome
- application declined; claim to proceed on merits
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Preliminary Objection, Employment Contracts, Strike Out Applications
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassan Aden Osman
Applicant
Cabinet Secretary for Defence and Chairperson of Defence Council
Respondent
Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out Claim as Time Barred
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim is time-barred under the Public Authorities Limitations Act and the Employment Act, 2007.
- 2 Whether the respondents can re-litigate a preliminary objection previously determined by the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents' application dated 30th December 2020 was a repetition of a preliminary objection previously raised and determined by the court in its ruling of 19th January 2016, which dismissed the objection and ordered the claim to be heard on its merits. The court held that if the respondents were dissatisfied with that ruling, their recourse was to appeal, not to bring the same objection before a different judge of coordinate jurisdiction. The court reaffirmed the principle that issues already determined by a competent court cannot be re-litigated and that the earlier ruling remains in force. Consequently, the application was declined, and the claim was directed...
Court Disposition
application declined; claim to proceed on merits
Orders
- The application dated 30th December 2020 is declined.
- The claim shall be heard on merit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Osman v CS Defence & another (Cause 32 of 2014) [2022] KEELRC 12728 (KLR) (29 September 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 12728 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause 32 of 2014
J Rika, J
September 29, 2022
Between
Hassan Aden Osman
Claimant
and
Cabinet Secretary for Defence and Chairperson of Defence Concil
1st Respondent
Hon. Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. The Respondents filed an Application dated 30th December 2020, asking the Court to find that the Claim is time-barred, under Section 3 and 5 of the Public Authorities Limitations Act, Cap 39 the Laws of Kenya, and Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
2. The Application is founded on the Affidavit of the Respondent’s Special State Counsel, Alice Muringo Mate, sworn on 30th December 2020. The Affidavit does not give the relevant dates, in particular, when the cause of action arose, but instead focuses on the history of the Claim before the Court, arguing that the Claimant has delayed in prosecuting the Claim, which in the view of the Court is a departure from the subject of time-bar.
3. The Claim was due for the main hearing on 29th June 2022, when the Advocates brought it to the attention of the Court, that there was an Application dated 30th December 2020, pending hearing. They agreed to have the Application considered on the strength of their Affidavits and Submissions. They confirmed filing and service of their Submissions at the last mention, on 29th July 2022.
The Court Finds: 4. The Application dated 30th December 2020, is a regurgitation of a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 7th September 2015. Objection was canvassed before the Court, which made a Ruling dated 19th January 2016, dismissing Objection. It was ordered that the Claim is heard on merit.
5. If the Respondents were aggrieved by that Ruling, they ought to have appealed, and not bring the Objection again, in the form of a Notice of Motion, 4 years down the line. The Application is an Appeal, brought before a different Judge of coordinate jurisdiction.
6. The Ruling is still in force, and this Court can only restate the orders made on 17th September 2015. It Is Ordered: -a.The Application is declined.b.The Claim shall be heard on merit.c.Parties to obtain an early hearing date at the registry, considering that the Claim was filed in 2014. d.Costs in the cause.
Dated, signed and released to the Parties electronically under the Ministry of Health and Judiciary Covid-19 Guidelines, at Nairobi, this 29th day of September 2022. JAMES RIKAJUDGE