[2023] KEELC 22200 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case by producing valid documents of title, including an allotment letter and a certificate of lease, establishing her as the registered proprietor of the suit land. The 1st defendant failed to file any response or provide justification for his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 22200 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Patrick Nyakerario Osoro; Defendant: Geofrfrey Nyachieo; Defendant: Land Registrar, Kisii; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E003 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for injunction allowed.
- Judges
- M Sila
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Ownership Disputes, Title Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Nyakerario Osoro
Plaintiff
Geofrfrey Nyachieo
Defendant
Land Registrar, Kisii
Defendant
Hon. Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for the grant of an interlocutory injunction.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable loss if the injunction is not granted.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience tilts in favour of the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case by producing valid documents of title, including an allotment letter and a certificate of lease, establishing her as the registered proprietor of the suit land. The 1st defendant failed to file any response or provide justification for his occupation or interference with the property. The court was satisfied that unless restrained, the 1st defendant's continued occupation and interference could result in irreparable loss to the plaintiff, as the land could be wasted or its value diminished. The balance of convenience was found to favour the plaintiff, who had established legal ownership and stood to suffer harm if the...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for injunction allowed.
Orders
- An order of injunction is issued restraining the 1st defendant from entering, keeping possession of, or interfering with the suit land pending hearing and determination of the case.
- Possession of the suit property to remain with the plaintiff pending hearing and determination of the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Osoro v Nyachieo & 2 others (Environment & Land Case E003 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 22200 (KLR) (6 December 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 22200 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Environment & Land Case E003 of 2023
M Sila, J
December 6, 2023
Between
Patrick Nyakerario Osoro
Plaintiff
and
Geofrfrey Nyachieo
1st Defendant
Land Registrar, Kisii
2nd Defendant
Hon. Attorney General
3rd Defendant
Ruling
(Application for injunction; principles to be applied; plaintiff asserting ownership of the suit land and availing documents of title to the same; plaintiff complaining of interference from the 1st defendant; 1st defendant not filing anything to oppose the application; court persuaded that the plaintiff has demonstrated a prima facie case and may suffer irreparable loss unless the 1st defendant is restrained; application for injunction allowed) 1. This suit was commenced through a plaint filed on 28 August 2023. The plaintiff avers to be the registered proprietor of the land parcel Kisii Municipality/Block I/781. In the plaint, she has pleaded that she was allocated this land by the Government on behalf of the Gusii County Council on 15 July 1993. Subsequently she obtained a lease which was issued to her on 19 April 1994. She states that she took possession of the land though she has been unable to develop it. She claims that the defendants have without any lawful justification entered her land and illegally built a temporary structure. In this suit, she wants the 1st defendant evicted from the suit land and permanently restrained from it.
2. Together with the plaint, the plaintiff filed an application for injunction seeking to restrain the 1st defendant from the suit land, and/or entering into any dealings with it, pending hearing and determination of the case. It is that application which is the subject of this ruling.
3. Despite being served, the 1st defendant has not entered appearance and has filed nothing towards the application. The State Law Office, on behalf of the 2nd and 3rd defendants, did not oppose the motion.
4. I have gone through the application and the material in support thereof. The plaintiff has displayed the Certificate of Lease to the suit land. She has demonstrated that she got the land after being issued with an allotment letter dated 15 July 1993 and a lease subsequently registered in her favour on 19 April 1996. I have no reason to doubt the documents presented by the plaintiff. As far as I can see, the plaintiff appears to be the registered proprietor of the suit land. The 1st defendant has not come to court to explain why he is interfering with the suit land or demonstrate that he has any interest in it.
5. In light of the foregoing, I am persuaded that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success. Unless stopped, the 1st defendant may waste the suit land to the detriment of the plaintiff which may lead the plaintiff to suffer irreparable loss.
6. I thus allow the plaintiff’s application for injunction. I issue an order stopping the 1st defendant from entering, keeping possession of, or in any way interfering with the suit land pending hearing and determination of this case. In other words, pending hearing and determination of this case, possession of the suit property be with the plaintiff. I also issue an order of injunction stopping the defendant from leasing, charging, selling, or entering into any disposition in respect of the suit land. To fortify this order, I issue an order restricting the registration of any disposition in the register of the suit land pending hearing and disposal of this suit.
7. The plaintiff shall have the costs of this application as against the 1st defendant.
8. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISII THIS 6 DAY OF DECEMBER 2023JUSTICE MUNYAO SILAJUDGE, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KISIIIn the presence of: -Mr. Migiro for applicantN/A for 1st respondentMr. Ndiritu for 2nd and 3rd respondents