[2024] KEELRC 1609 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 1609 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by factors beyond her control, specifically the unavailability of the judgment and proceedings from the trial court. The court recognized the applicant's right of appeal and noted that the interests of justice favored granting leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1609 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Everline Ongubo Osoro; Respondent: Nyangena Hospital Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E049 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Change of Advocate
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
S Radido
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Change of Advocate, Appeal Procedure, Delay and Excusable Neglect
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Leave to Appeal Out of Time Change of Advocate Appeal Procedure Delay and Excusable Neglect

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everline Ongubo Osoro

Applicant

Nyangena Hospital Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Change of Advocate

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment in Kisii MC ELRC No E007 of 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates should be allowed to come on record for the applicant in place of previous advocates.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by factors beyond her control, specifically the unavailability of the judgment and proceedings from the trial court. The court recognized the applicant's right of appeal and noted that the interests of justice favored granting leave to appeal out of time. The court also observed that the respondent did not object to the change of advocate. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to allow the firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates to come on record for the applicant and granted the applicant leave to file and serve a memorandum of appeal within 30 days.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The firm of Ombui Ratemo & Associates Advocates is allowed to come on record for the applicant.
  • The applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Memorandum of Appeal within 30 days from the date of the ruling.