[2017] KEHC 4590 (KLR)
The court held that under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, an advocate is entitled to charge interest at 14% per annum on costs from the expiration of one month after delivery of the bill to the client, provided the claim for interest is made before payment. In this case, the bill of costs was served on...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 4590 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates; Respondent: Kenindia Assurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 330 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed in full
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates
Applicant
Kenindia Assurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of costs should be adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
- 2 Whether interest on the taxed costs should accrue from the date of service of the bill of costs or from the date of taxation.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, an advocate is entitled to charge interest at 14% per annum on costs from the expiration of one month after delivery of the bill to the client, provided the claim for interest is made before payment. In this case, the bill of costs was served on the respondent on 10.12.15, and 30 days expired on 9.1.16. The respondent's argument that interest should accrue only from the date of taxation (3.4.17) was rejected as contrary to the clear legal provision. The court therefore allowed the application, entering judgment for the applicant for the taxed sum, awarding interest from 9.1.16, and granting costs of the application to...
Court Disposition
application allowed in full
Orders
- Judgment entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 111,358.84.
- Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 9.1.16 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO 330 OF 2015
OTIENO, RAGOT& COMPANY ADVOCATES.....................APPLICANT
VERSUS
KENINDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
By a notice of motion dated 15. 5.17, brought under Section 51 of the Advocates Act Cap 16 Laws of Kenya; the applicant prays for orders:-
a. THAT the certificate of costs dated 3. 4.17 in respect of the order made on 3. 4.17 for the sum of Kshs. 111,358. 84 be adopted as judgment and decree of this Honourable Court
b. THAT the applicant be awarded interest accrued on the costs at 14% per annum from 10. 1.16 until payment in full
c. THAT the costs of this application be borne by client/respondent
The motion is premised on the grounds on the body of the application and the supporting affidavit of Moreen Alinaitwe, Advocate of the High Court of Kenya, sworn on 15. 5.17. She averred that the client instructed the advocate to act for it in KISUMU HCCA No. 44 of 2010. That the bill of costs dated 25. 11. 15 was forwarded and received by the client on 10. 12. 15. That the bill of costs was taxed on 3. 4.17 in the sum of Kshs. 111,358. 84 and a certificate of taxation was issued for the said sum. That the client has not paid the said amount and the applicant requests for judgment for the entire sum.
When the application came for hearing on 28. 6.17, Ms. Aron for the client conceded to prayer (a) and submitted that interest should run from 3. 4.17 when the costs due were ascertained.
Mr. Osodo for the advocate submitted that interest is payable 30 days from the date the bill of costs is served on a client.
I have considered the provisions of Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order which provides: -
“An advocate may charge interest at 14% per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, providing such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill has been paid or tendered in full.”
The rate of interest awardable is 14% per annum applicable from 30 days after the date of service of either the Bill of Costs. There is evidence that the bill of costs in this matter was served on 10. 12. 15. Thirty (30) days from the delivery of the bill to the client expired on 9. 1.16.
The upshot of this is that the respondent’s submission that interest should accrue from 3. 4.17, goes against clear provisions of the law and it is unsustainable. The notice of motion dated 15. 5.17 succeeds and is allowed in the following terms:
a) Judgment is hereby entered for the advocate against the Respondent for Kshs. 111,358. 84
b) Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 9. 1.16 until payment in full
c) The Advocate will also have the costs of this application.
DATED AND DELIVERED ON THIS13thDAY OFJuly2017
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Read in open court in the presence of-
Court Assistant - Felix
Applicant - No appearance
Respondent – No appearance