[2019] KEHC 1960 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as the respondent had not denied the retainer or opposed the application. The certificate of costs was final as to the amount, and the applicant was entitled to interest at 14% per annum from one month after service of the bill until...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 1960 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates; Respondent: Chemelil Sugar Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application Application92 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs, interest at 14% per annum from 14th July 2019 until payment in full, and costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates
Applicant
Chemelil Sugar Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of costs issued pursuant to taxation should be adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs and at what rate.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as the respondent had not denied the retainer or opposed the application. The certificate of costs was final as to the amount, and the applicant was entitled to interest at 14% per annum from one month after service of the bill until payment in full, in accordance with Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The court also awarded the costs of the application to the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs, interest at 14% per annum from 14th July 2019 until payment in full, and costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 186,609.50.
- Interest shall be paid at 14% per annum from 14th July 2019 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2019
BETWEEN
OTIENO, RAGOT & COMPANY ADVOCATES...............APPLICANT/ADVOCATE
AND
CHEMELIL SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED.........................RESPONDENT/CLIENT
RULING
1. By a Notice of Motion dated 11th July, 2019 and filed on 17th July, 2019, brought under the provisions of Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act, the Applicant/Advocate seeks the following orders:
1) That the certificate of costs issued herein in respect of taxation order made on 31. 05. 19 for the sum of Kshs. 186,609. 50 (one hundred eighty-six, six hundred nine and fifty cents) be adopted as judgment and decree of this Honourable Court together with interest at 14% p.a from 09. 04. 17 payment in full
2) That costs of this application be borne by the Client/Respondent
2. The Respondent though served neither opposed the application nor sent representation when the matter came up for hearing on 01. 10. 19.
3. I have considered the Application in the light of the supporting affidavit and annexures thereto. The bill of costs was taxed at Kshs. 186,609. 50 and a certificate in respect thereof dated 10th July, 2019 was issued on 12th July, 2019.
4. The bill arose out of Nyando SRMCC NO. 169 of 2008 Doreen Barngetuny v Chemelil Sugar Company Ltd. The Respondent has not denied retaining the Advocate to act for it and the Advocate/Applicant is therefore entitled to its costs.
5. The Bill of costs was served on the Respondent/Client on 14th June 2019. I have considered the provisions of Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order and I find that interest from14th July, 2019 until payment in full.
6. The upshot of this is that Notice of Motion dated 11th July, 2019 and filed on 17th July, 2019, succeeds and is allowed in the following terms:
a)Judgment is hereby entered for the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondent/Client forKshs. 186,609. 50 (one hundred eighty-six, six hundred nine and fifty cents)
b) Interest shall be paid at 14% from 14th July, 2019 till payment in full
c) The Advocate will also have the costs of this application.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED ON THIS..14th..DAY OF...November..2019
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Read in open court in the presence of-
Court Assistant - Amondi/Okodoi
For Applicant/Advocate - Ms. Sijenje hb Ms. Onsongo
For Respondent/Client - N/A