[2019] KEHC 2479 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2479 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having acted for the respondent in the referenced suit and with the retainer not being disputed, was entitled to the taxed costs. The certificate of costs issued after taxation was not challenged by the respondent, and thus, under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, it could be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2479 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates; Respondent: Chemelil Sugar Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 97 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates

Applicant

Chemelil Sugar Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of costs issued upon taxation should be adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest at 14% per annum from the date specified under the Advocates Remuneration Order.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, having acted for the respondent in the referenced suit and with the retainer not being disputed, was entitled to the taxed costs. The certificate of costs issued after taxation was not challenged by the respondent, and thus, under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, it could be adopted as a judgment and decree of the court. Regarding interest, the court applied Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, holding that interest at 14% per annum was payable from 30 days after delivery of the bill of costs to the client, which was 14th July, 2019. The respondent's failure to oppose the application or appear in court further supported the grant of the orders...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 118,289.54.
  • Interest at 14% per annum from 14th July, 2019 until payment in full.