[2023] KEHC 20605 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 20605 (KLR)

The court found that since the respondent had never attended the appellate court or filed any documents, he had not participated in the matter. Therefore, he was not entitled to costs. The appeal having been withdrawn and the respondent having taken no steps in the proceedings, the appropriate order was that each...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 20605 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: George Joseph Otieno; Respondent: Ben Oluoch
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E014 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Costs After Withdrawal of Appeal
Outcome
No order as to costs; file closed.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Appeal, Costs Award, Non Participation of Party
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Appeal Costs Award Non Participation of Party

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Joseph Otieno

Appellant

Ben Oluoch

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Costs After Withdrawal of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is entitled to costs where he has not participated in the appeal proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the respondent had never attended the appellate court or filed any documents, he had not participated in the matter. Therefore, he was not entitled to costs. The appeal having been withdrawn and the respondent having taken no steps in the proceedings, the appropriate order was that each party bear their own costs and the file be closed.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs; file closed.

Orders

  • There shall be no order as to costs.
  • The court file is to be closed.