[2022] KEHC 13157 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 13157 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any plausible or satisfactory reason for the inordinate delay of nearly two years in seeking leave to appeal out of time. Furthermore, the applicant misrepresented the sentence imposed by claiming he was sentenced to death, whereas the record shows he was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 13157 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Owino Otieno; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E100 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Criminal Appeals, Extension of Time, Conviction and Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Criminal Appeals Extension of Time Conviction and Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Owino Otieno

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any plausible or satisfactory reason for the inordinate delay of nearly two years in seeking leave to appeal out of time. Furthermore, the applicant misrepresented the sentence imposed by claiming he was sentenced to death, whereas the record shows he was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. The court held that the applicant's dishonesty and lack of explanation for the delay disentitled him to the court's discretionary power to extend time. Consequently, the application was found to be devoid of merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
  • File closed.