[2023] KEHC 25768 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 25768 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was properly convicted and sentenced for the offence of grievous harm, with the sentence of 10 years imprisonment being within the legal limits set by section 234 of the Penal Code. The applicant failed to demonstrate any incorrectness, illegality, or impropriety in the sentence as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 25768 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Odhiambo Otieno; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E095 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Grievous Harm, Criminal Procedure Code Section 364, Penal Code Section 234
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Grievous Harm Criminal Procedure Code Section 364 Penal Code Section 234

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Odhiambo Otieno

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated any incorrectness, illegality or impropriety in the sentence imposed by the trial court.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court should exercise its revisionary jurisdiction to alter the applicant's sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was properly convicted and sentenced for the offence of grievous harm, with the sentence of 10 years imprisonment being within the legal limits set by section 234 of the Penal Code. The applicant failed to demonstrate any incorrectness, illegality, or impropriety in the sentence as required for the court to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction under section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, the application for revision was found to be incompetent and lacking in merit, and was dismissed in its entirety.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision of sentence is dismissed wholly.