[2023] KEHC 17928 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 17928 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely that the judgment was delivered in his absence and it took time to trace the file. There was no evidence of indolence on the part of the applicant in pursuing his rights. The court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 17928 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Erick Sangaye Otondi; Respondent: Nancy Jeptepkeny Lagat; Respondent: Harun Kamau Macharia
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application E008 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Exercise of Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Right of Appeal Exercise of Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Sangaye Otondi

Applicant

Nancy Jeptepkeny Lagat

Respondent

Harun Kamau Macharia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated good and sufficient cause for failure to file the appeal within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely that the judgment was delivered in his absence and it took time to trace the file. There was no evidence of indolence on the part of the applicant in pursuing his rights. The court exercised its discretion under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, considering the period and reason for delay, and the right of appeal. The absence of opposition from the respondents and the applicant's readiness to comply with court directions further supported the grant of leave. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and granted the applicant leave to file the appeal out of time,...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file appeal out of time against the judgment delivered in Narok CMCC E023 of 2021.
  • The applicant to file and serve his Memorandum of Appeal within fourteen (14) days hereof.