[2019] KEHC 2388 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2388 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having acted for the respondent and obtained a taxed bill of costs, was entitled to have the certificate of costs adopted as a judgment and decree of the court. Since the retainer was not disputed and the respondent did not oppose the application, the applicant's entitlement to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2388 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Owiti, Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates; Respondent: Chemelil Sugar Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 102 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Owiti, Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates

Applicant

Chemelil Sugar Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of costs issued upon taxation should be adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest at 14% per annum from the date specified under the Advocates Remuneration Order.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, having acted for the respondent and obtained a taxed bill of costs, was entitled to have the certificate of costs adopted as a judgment and decree of the court. Since the retainer was not disputed and the respondent did not oppose the application, the applicant's entitlement to the taxed costs was not in question. The court further held that, under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, interest at 14% per annum was payable from 30 days after delivery of the bill of costs to the client, which in this case was from 14th July, 2019. The applicant was also entitled to the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 38,437.60.
  • Interest shall be paid at 14% per annum from 14th July, 2019 until payment in full.