[2024] KECA 1540 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had provided a plausible explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the late supply of the High Court judgment. Applying the principles from Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo vs. Paul Kipkorir Kibet [2018] eKLR, the court held that the explanation was satisfactory and that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KECA 1540 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrew Omondi Owuor “A” Antony Njenga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal (Application) E112 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed; leave to appeal out of time granted.
- Judges
- JM Mativo
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Conviction and Sentence, Discretionary Powers, Delay in Filing, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Omondi Owuor “A” Antony Njenga
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time given the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had provided a plausible explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the late supply of the High Court judgment. Applying the principles from Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo vs. Paul Kipkorir Kibet [2018] eKLR, the court held that the explanation was satisfactory and that the lengthy sentence being served by the applicant further justified the exercise of discretion in his favour. Consequently, the court granted leave to file the appeal out of time, deeming the notice and memorandum of appeal as duly filed and directing that the record of appeal be filed within 60 days.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; leave to appeal out of time granted.
Orders
- The notice of appeal dated 3rd July, 2024 and memorandum of appeal dated 3rd July, 2024 are deemed as duly filed.
- The record of appeal shall be filed within 60 days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Owuor “A” Antony Njenga v Republic (Criminal Appeal (Application) E112 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1540 (KLR) (5 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KECA 1540 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Criminal Appeal (Application) E112 of 2024
JM Mativo, JA
November 5, 2024
Between
Andrew Omondi Owuor “A” Antony Njenga
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application for leave to file an appeal out of time from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kabarnet (J. M. Bwononga, J.) dated 12th February, 2021 in HCCRA No. 04 of 2019)
Ruling
1. The application before the Court is undated. The main prayer is for leave to be granted to the applicant to appeal out of time against the judgment issued in HCCA No. 4 of 2019, on 12th February, 2021.
2. The applicant, Andrew Omondi Owuor was arraigned before the Magistrate’s Court in Criminal Case No. 779 of 2017 at Eldama Ravine charged with the offence of attempted murder contrary to Section 220 of the Penal Code. He was convicted and sentenced to serve forty (40) years imprisonment.
3. His appeal to the High Court against his conviction was dismissed. However, his sentence was reduced to twenty-five (25) years imprisonment. Although aggrieved, the applicant failed to lodge his notice of appeal within the statutory- stipulated time of fourteen (14) days. His present application invokes Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to enlarge the time he is permitted to file his appeal.
4. It is the applicant’s case that the reason for the delay in filing his appeal on time was because he was not supplied with the High Court’s Judgment on time and that he filed his appeal to this Court on 27th March, 2023 but did not get any feedback.
5. In response to the application, vide written submissions dated 30th October, 2024, Mr. Omutelema Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecution has amiably conceded to the leave application pointing to the lengthy sentence the applicant is currently serving.
6. I have considered the application, the undated supporting affidavit, the notice of appeal dated 3rd July, 2024, and the memorandum of appeal dated 3rd July, 2024. It is evident that there has been a delay of approximately 1 years and four months in filing the appeal against the judgment of the High Court. The applicant’s position is that the delay was occasioned by delay in furnishing him with the judgment of the High Court.
7. The Supreme Court of Kenya pronounced itself in the question of extension of time in the case of Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo vs. Paul Kipkorir Kibet [2018] eKLR, and stated as follows:“The law does not set out any minimum or maximum period of delay. All it states is that any delay should be satisfactorily explained. A plausible and satisfactory explanation for delay is the key that unlocks the court’s flow of discretionary favour. There has to be valid and clear reasons, upon which discretion can be favourably exercisable.”
8. In applying the principles in Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringovs. Paul Kipkorir Kibet (supra), and considering that the applicant is serving a twenty-five year sentence, I am inclined to exercise my discretion in his favour. The notice of appeal dated and memorandum of appeal both dated 3rd July, 2024 are deemed as duly filed. The record of appeal shall be filed within 60 days from today.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. J. MATIVO............................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.Signed.DEPUTY REGISTRAR.