[2023] KEHC 1112 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 1112 (KLR)

The court held that it had already considered the appropriate sentence and expressly determined when the sentence would commence. The judge was fully aware of the period to be credited and made a conscious decision regarding the start date of the sentence. The court further held that it is functus officio and cannot...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 1112 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Andrew Omondi Owuor alias Antony Njenga; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kabarnet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 4 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Sentencing Review, Functus Officio, Custodial Sentence, Pretrial Detention Credit
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Review Functus Officio Custodial Sentence Pretrial Detention Credit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Omondi Owuor alias Antony Njenga

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can review its own judgment to credit the applicant with pre-sentence custody period.
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of functus officio bars the court from revisiting its sentencing decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it had already considered the appropriate sentence and expressly determined when the sentence would commence. The judge was fully aware of the period to be credited and made a conscious decision regarding the start date of the sentence. The court further held that it is functus officio and cannot review or alter its own judgment in the manner sought by the applicant. The only available recourse for the applicant is to appeal the decision, not to seek review before the same court.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is dismissed.