[2025] KEHC 524 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, having been convicted and sentenced for defilement and being late by about one month in filing his appeal, demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay due to his status as a pauper and lack of legal knowledge. The court was persuaded that challenges faced by prisoners acting in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 524 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: William Atito Owuor; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E115 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DK Kemei
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Conviction and Sentence, Defilement Offence, Sexual Offences Act, Pauper Applicant, Prisoner Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Atito Owuor
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against conviction and sentence.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was justified given the applicant's circumstances.
- 3 Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if leave is granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, having been convicted and sentenced for defilement and being late by about one month in filing his appeal, demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay due to his status as a pauper and lack of legal knowledge. The court was persuaded that challenges faced by prisoners acting in person justified the grant of leave. Further, the respondent would not suffer any prejudice if leave was granted. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal out of time was allowed to enable the applicant to ventilate his appeal on the merits.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file Petition of Appeal and serve the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions within 14 days of the ruling, failing which the leave shall lapse.
- File is closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
Owuor v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E115 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 524 (KLR) (17 January 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 524 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E115 of 2024
DK Kemei, J
January 17, 2025
Between
William Atito Owuor
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant herein has filed the present application dated 23/9/2024 seeking for leave to lodge appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence by Hon. B. Limo dated 22/8/2024. His gravamen is inter alia; that he is a pauper; that he was not aware of the stringent consequences of failing to appeal within 14 days; that due to interacy on matters of law he was late in lodging his appeal.
2. I have considered the application. It is not in dispute that the Applicant was convicted and sentenced by the trial court on 22/8/2024 over an offence of defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act to 20 years imprisonment vide Siaya CMC Cr. SO No. E053 of 2022. It is not in dispute that the Applicant herein had filed Misc. Cr. Application No E050 of 2022 seeking for leave to lodge appeal out of time from conviction and sentence of the Chief Magistrates Court at Siaya in Criminal Case No. E014 of 2022. It is not in dispute that the Applicant subsequently lodged HCRA No. E017/2022 which was later allowed by Aburili J, who ordered for a retrial of the Applicant and which led to the Siaya CM Cr. S.O NO. E053 of 2022. It is not in dispute that the station provided for 14 days to lodge appeal had since elapsed. The Applicant has been late for about one month. Due to challenges faced by prisoners especially those acting in person, I am persuaded that the Applicant merits to be given time to lodge his appeal. I find that no prejudice will be suffered by the Respondent if the Applicant is allowed to appeal out of time so as to enable him ventilate his appeal.
3. In the result, I find merit in the Applicant’s application dated 23/9/2024. The same is allowed. The Applicant is granted leave to file Petition of Appeal and serve the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) within 14 days of today’s failing which the leave shall lapse. File is closed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 17THDAY OF JANUARY, 2025. D. KEMEIJUDGEIn the presence of:William Atito Awuor……….ApplicantM/s Kerubo……………..for RespondentMboya………………..Court Assistant