[2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR)

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain judicial review proceedings arising from decisions of the Rent Restriction Tribunal, as such jurisdiction is expressly reserved for the Environment and Land Court by Article 162(2) of the Constitution, the Environment and Land Court Act, and the Rent Restriction Act....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Habwe Oyiera; Respondent: Rent Restriction Tribunal; Respondent: Marygoretty Owiti; Respondent: Ocs Maseno Police Station
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E012 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Urgency
Outcome
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Jurisdiction of Courts, Rent Restriction Tribunal, Environment and Land Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Judicial Review Jurisdiction of Courts Rent Restriction Tribunal Environment and Land Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Habwe Oyiera

Applicant

Rent Restriction Tribunal

Respondent

Marygoretty Owiti

Respondent

Ocs Maseno Police Station

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Urgency

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine judicial review proceedings arising from decisions of the Rent Restriction Tribunal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition is properly before the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain judicial review proceedings arising from decisions of the Rent Restriction Tribunal, as such jurisdiction is expressly reserved for the Environment and Land Court by Article 162(2) of the Constitution, the Environment and Land Court Act, and the Rent Restriction Act. The application was therefore incompetently filed before the High Court, and the court struck it out on its own motion for want of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is conferred by statute and the Constitution, not by the parties, and the High Court cannot arrogate to itself powers reserved for another court by law.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The application dated 21st May, 2024 is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
  • The applicant to file pleadings before the court with jurisdiction.