[2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain judicial review proceedings arising from decisions of the Rent Restriction Tribunal, as such jurisdiction is expressly reserved for the Environment and Land Court by Article 162(2) of the Constitution, the Environment and Land Court Act, and the Rent Restriction Act....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Habwe Oyiera; Respondent: Rent Restriction Tribunal; Respondent: Marygoretty Owiti; Respondent: Ocs Maseno Police Station
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Application E012 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Urgency
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdiction of Courts, Rent Restriction Tribunal, Environment and Land Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Habwe Oyiera
Applicant
Rent Restriction Tribunal
Respondent
Marygoretty Owiti
Respondent
Ocs Maseno Police Station
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Urgency
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine judicial review proceedings arising from decisions of the Rent Restriction Tribunal.
- 2 Whether the application for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition is properly before the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain judicial review proceedings arising from decisions of the Rent Restriction Tribunal, as such jurisdiction is expressly reserved for the Environment and Land Court by Article 162(2) of the Constitution, the Environment and Land Court Act, and the Rent Restriction Act. The application was therefore incompetently filed before the High Court, and the court struck it out on its own motion for want of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is conferred by statute and the Constitution, not by the parties, and the High Court cannot arrogate to itself powers reserved for another court by law.
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The application dated 21st May, 2024 is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- The applicant to file pleadings before the court with jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
Oyiera v Rent Restriction Tribunal & 2 others (Judicial Review Application E012 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR) (23 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5834 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Judicial Review Application E012 of 2024
RE Aburili, J
May 23, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF THE RENT RESTRICTION ACT IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND PROHBITION
Between
Habwe Oyiera
Applicant
and
The Rent Restriction Tribunal
1st Respondent
Marygoretty Owiti
2nd Respondent
Ocs Maseno Police Station
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. This court having reviewed the application dated 21st May, 2024 filed under certificate of urgency, grounds and supporting affidavit and the annextures thereto, it makes the following findings.a.That the application is not certified urgent.b.That this court is devoid of any jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute between the parties hereto.
2. On why this court has declined jurisdiction to hear and determine the judicial review application, the case of Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lilian S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd [1989] eKLR settled the question of jurisdiction of courts and tribunals in the following terms:“jurisdiction is everything. Without it, a court has no power to make one more step. …”
3. The jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court is donated by Article 162(2) of the Constitution of Kenya which provides that:“Parliament shall establish courts with the status of the High Court to hear and determine disputes relating to- (b) the environment and the use and occupation of, and title to, land.”
4. Section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act outlines the disputes which the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction over. Section 313(4) further confers the Court with the appellate jurisdiction over the decisions of subordinate courts or local tribunals in respect of matters falling within the jurisdiction of the Court.
5. Additionally, section 13(7) of the Environment and Land Court Act sets out the orders that the Court may make including prerogative orders which latter are judicial review orders.
6. In the instant application, the Applicant has moved this court for stay of the decision of the 30th April, 2024 and on subsequent dates stated in the application subject of this ruling made by the Rent Restriction Tribunal pending hearing and determination of the judicial Review proceedings herein and leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari to call into this court and quash the said proceedings before the Rent Restriction Tribunal.
7. Section 4 of the Rent Restriction Act establishes the Tribunal, while Section 8 provides that:(1)Except as provided by subsection (2), every decision, determination and order of the tribunal under the provisions of this Act shall be final and conclusive, and no appeal shall lie therefrom to any court.(2)An appeal shall lie to the Environment and Land Court from any such decision, determination or order in the following cases -(a)in the case of an order under subsection (5) of section 6; or(b)on any point of law; or(c)in the case of premises whereof the standard rent exceeds one thousand shillings a month, on any point of mixed fact and law, and for the purposes of this subsection, the determination of any rent or of any sum shall be a matter of fact…
8. With the above provisions in mind, and with the express prohibition in Article 165(5) (b) of the Constitution that the High Court shall not exercise jurisdiction reserved for the Courts established under Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Supreme Court, I find that this would be arrogating itself of jurisdiction exclusively reserved for the Environment and Land Court by statute which is the Rent Restriction Act. Jurisdiction is conferred by statute and the Constitution not by parties.
9. For the above reasons, I find the application dated 21st May, 2024 to be incompetently filed before this Court and on the court’s own motion, I hereby decline jurisdiction and strike out that application. The applicant to file pleadings before the court with jurisdiction.
10. This file is closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2024R.E. ABURILIJUDGE