[2024] KEHC 8792 (KLR)
The court held that, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the period the applicant spent in pre-trial custody must be factored into the computation of his custodial sentence. The judge considered the affidavit evidence and found no reason to depart from the statutory requirement. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 8792 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Silvance Otieno Oyola; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E123 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MS Shariff
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Computation, Pre Trial Custody, Criminal Procedure Code Section 333 2
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silvance Otieno Oyola
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pre-trial period served in custody by the applicant should be factored into the computation of his custodial sentence pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the period the applicant spent in pre-trial custody must be factored into the computation of his custodial sentence. The judge considered the affidavit evidence and found no reason to depart from the statutory requirement. The court therefore ordered that the pre-trial period served by the applicant be included in the calculation of his sentence, ensuring compliance with the law and upholding the applicant's rights under the criminal justice system.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The pre-trial period served in custody by the applicant shall be factored in during the computation of his custodial term pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
Oyola v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E123 of 2004) [2024] KEHC 8792 (KLR) (23 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8792 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E123 of 2004
MS Shariff, J
July 23, 2024
Between
Silvance Otieno Oyola
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
Representation:23/7/2024Before M. S. Shariff L. J. 1. I have considered the considered the application herein and the affidavit in support thereof sworn by Silavance Otieno Oyola and I do hereby order that the pre-trial period served in custody by the Applicant be factored in during the computation of his custodial term pursuant to the provision of Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
2. It is hereby so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 23RDDAY OF JULY, 2024. M. S. SHARIFFJUDGE