[2021] KEHC 7883 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7883 (KLR)

The court found that there was a clear arithmetical error in the calculation of the total damages awarded in the original judgment. The figures for pain and suffering, loss of expectation of life, and loss of dependency were not correctly totaled, and the 10% contribution was not properly deducted before adding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7883 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Oyugi Juma Joseph; Respondent: Grace Omwanda Ogolla
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 9 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Amend Judgment and Decree
Outcome
application allowed; judgment and decree amended to correct arithmetical error
Legal Topics
Correction of Judgment, Arithmetical Error, Clerical Mistake, Quantum of Damages
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Correction of Judgment Arithmetical Error Clerical Mistake Quantum of Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oyugi Juma Joseph

Appellant

Grace Omwanda Ogolla

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Amend Judgment and Decree

  1. 1 Whether the court can amend its judgment and decree to correct an arithmetical error in the quantum of damages awarded.
  2. 2 Whether the figures in the original judgment reflected the correct calculation after accounting for contribution and special damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was a clear arithmetical error in the calculation of the total damages awarded in the original judgment. The figures for pain and suffering, loss of expectation of life, and loss of dependency were not correctly totaled, and the 10% contribution was not properly deducted before adding special damages. Applying Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held that it was empowered to correct such errors at any time, whether on its own motion or on application by a party. The court recalculated the damages, deducting the correct 10% contribution from the total general damages and then adding the special damages, resulting in a revised total award. The...

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment and decree amended to correct arithmetical error

Orders

  • The application dated 19.1.2021 is allowed.
  • The judgment and decree of this court made pursuant to the judgment of 30.11.2020 is amended to reflect the correct award as recalculated.