[2025] KEBPRT 233 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Tenant's application sought to challenge or re-open issues that had already been conclusively determined by both the Tribunal and the Environment & Land Court, including orders for vacant possession and dismissal of the Tenant's appeals. The Tribunal held that it was functus officio, lacking jurisdiction to revisit the matter, and that the application was res-judicata. The Tribunal further found the Tenant's repeated applications to be an abuse of process, intended to frustrate the Landlord's enjoyment of his property rights. The Tribunal dismissed the application and struck out the suit, ordering the Tenant to bear the costs.
- Citation
- [2025] KEBPRT 233 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernard Oyugi; Respondent: Kenneth Kaunda Kimani
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 8 April 2025
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 1414 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed and suit struck out as res-judicata and abuse of process
- Judges
- CN Mugambi
- Legal Topics
- Landlord Tenant Disputes, Termination of Tenancy, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Oyugi
Applicant
Kenneth Kaunda Kimani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tenant is entitled to orders restraining the Landlord from interfering with his tenancy in the suit premises.
- 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the Tenant's application in light of previous determinations.
- 3 Whether the Tenant's application is res-judicata and an abuse of court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Tenant's application sought to challenge or re-open issues that had already been conclusively determined by both the Tribunal and the Environment & Land Court, including orders for vacant possession and dismissal of the Tenant's appeals. The Tribunal held that it was functus officio, lacking jurisdiction to revisit the matter, and that the application was res-judicata. The Tribunal further found the Tenant's repeated applications to be an abuse of process, intended to frustrate the Landlord's enjoyment of his property rights. The Tribunal dismissed the application and struck out the suit, ordering the Tenant to bear the costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed and suit struck out as res-judicata and abuse of process
Orders
- The Tenant's application is dismissed.
- The suit is struck out as res-judicata and an abuse of court process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment