[2022] KEHC 14588 (KLR)
The court found that the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, as applied to the petitioner, was unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Muruatetu and persuasive authority in Philip Mueke Mangi. The trial magistrate had no discretion to consider...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 14588 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: George Ouma Oyugi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E018 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Resentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- petition_allowed_in_part
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sexual Offences Act, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Resentencing, Constitutionality of Sentencing, Mitigation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Ouma Oyugi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Resentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act is unconstitutional.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing based on recent jurisprudence.
- 3 What sentence is appropriate considering the circumstances and mitigation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, as applied to the petitioner, was unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Muruatetu and persuasive authority in Philip Mueke Mangi. The trial magistrate had no discretion to consider mitigation or impose a non-custodial sentence due to the statutory minimum. The High Court exercised its discretion to resentence, taking into account the petitioner's mitigation, the period spent in remand, and the circumstances of the offence. The petitioner was resentenced to 15 years imprisonment, with credit for time spent in remand custody.
Court Disposition
petition_allowed_in_part
Orders
- The petitioner is resentenced to 15 years imprisonment, taking into account the period spent in remand custody from July 20, 2014 to August 4, 2014.
- The file is hereby closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Oyugi v Republic (Criminal Petition E018 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 14588 (KLR) (26 October 2022) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 14588 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Petition E018 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
October 26, 2022
Between
George Ouma Oyugi
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
(Petition for Resentencing in Kisumu CM Sexual Offence Case No. 90/2014 and in Kisumu Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 2018 on 29/1/2020 by Hon. T.W. Cherere, J)
Judgment
1. The Petitioner herein is George Ouma Oyugi. He petitions this court for resentencing following his conviction and sentence in Kisumu CM Sexual Offence case No 90/2014 wherein he was sentenced to serve 20 years imprisonment for the offence of defilement contrary to Section 8 (1)as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act.
2. He appealed vide Kisumu HCRA 48/2018 which appeal was dismissed on January 29, 2020 by TW Cherere, J in a judgment read by Hon FA Ochieng J (as he then was).In his petition for resentencing, he does not indicate whether he was appealed to the Court of Appeal.
3. He claims that the Mandatory Minimum Sentence imposed on him is unconstitutional and relies on the case of Philip Mueke Mangi V Republic Machakos HC Petition No E017 of 2021 delivered by Odunga, J on May 17, 2022.
4. I have perused the judgment by the trial court, the proceedings and judgment in the High Court.
5. The Petitioner was arrested on July 20, 2014 and was released on bond on August 4, 2014 pending trial.
6. I have considered the circumstances under which the offence was committed. The victim was aged 14 years. She was lured by the Petitioner to a bush where the Petitioner removed her clothes and defiled her. There was evidence of penetration.
7. Section 8 (3) of the Sexual Offences Act provides for mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years imprisonment upon conviction. Before being sentenced, the petitioner mitigated and pleaded for leniency saying he had been involved in a road traffic accident. The record shows that indeed the hearing of the case could not proceed for a while as the accused was involved in an accident. He had been undergoing treatment, he therefore, pleaded for a non-custodial sentence.
8. In his sentencing remarks, the trial magistrate Hon CN Oruo, Resident Magistrate, noted and considered the mitigations but noted that, “the Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006 does not give me the option of a non-custodial sentence. The accused will not benefit from one. At the time of the incident the victim was 14years of age. I shall therefore proceed to sentence the accused person to 20years imprisonment. 14 days Right of Appeal.”
9. Having considered the above and the principles laid down in the Francis Muruatetu V Republic[2017]eKLR case and the persuasive decision rendered in Philip Mueke Mangi V Republic[2022]eKLR, I hereby exercise discretion and resentence the Petitioner to serve 15years imprisonment taking into account the period he was in remand custody from the date of his arrest on July 20, 2014 to the date he was released on bond on August 4, 2014.
10. I so order.
11. The file is hereby closed.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisumu this 26thDay of October, 2022R.E. ABURILIJUDGEPage 2 of 2