[2015] KEHC 3690 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3690 (KLR)

The court held that child maintenance is a mandatory legal and constitutional obligation that cannot be suspended or waived, even if the parent is unemployed. The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for stay of the maintenance orders, as the law requires that children must be provided for at all...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3690 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: P M C; Respondent: A N G
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 97 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Review in Children's Court
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Child Maintenance, Parental Responsibility, Children Act Application
Source Language
en
Family and Children Child Maintenance Parental Responsibility Children Act Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P M C

Appellant

A N G

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Review in Children's Court

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant a stay of orders for child maintenance pending review in the Children’s Court.
  2. 2 Whether inability to pay due to unemployment justifies suspension of child maintenance obligations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that child maintenance is a mandatory legal and constitutional obligation that cannot be suspended or waived, even if the parent is unemployed. The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for stay of the maintenance orders, as the law requires that children must be provided for at all times. The absence of opposition from the respondent does not alter the legal requirement for maintenance. The application for stay was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 14th November 2014 is dismissed.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.