[2013] KEHC 6641 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6641 (KLR)

The court found that the suit was not properly instituted as required for matrimonial property disputes, which should be commenced under Section 17 of the Married Women's Property Act, 1882, by way of Originating Summons. As the current suit was brought by plaint rather than the prescribed procedure, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6641 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: P O M; Respondent: M N K alias M N P
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 6 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Motion
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of proper procedure; temporary preservatory orders granted for 30 days to allow regularization.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Property Disputes, Joint Ownership, Injunctive Relief, Procedure Irregularity
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Matrimonial Property Disputes Joint Ownership Injunctive Relief Procedure Irregularity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P O M

Plaintiff

M N K alias M N P

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Motion

  1. 1 Whether the suit was properly instituted under the correct procedure for matrimonial property disputes.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim preservatory orders regarding the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit was not properly instituted as required for matrimonial property disputes, which should be commenced under Section 17 of the Married Women's Property Act, 1882, by way of Originating Summons. As the current suit was brought by plaint rather than the prescribed procedure, the court declined to entertain the substantive motion. However, recognizing the potential hardship to the plaintiff and the court's ongoing jurisdiction, the judge granted temporary preservatory orders to maintain the status quo for 30 days, allowing the plaintiff time to regularize the proceedings by filing the claim in the correct form.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of proper procedure; temporary preservatory orders granted for 30 days to allow regularization.

Orders

  • Plaintiff granted 30 days to file the claim in proper form under Section 17 of the Married Women's Property Act, 1882, by Originating Summons.
  • Temporary preservatory orders in terms of prayer 2 of the Motion granted for 30 days.