Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Environment and land law [2026] KEMC 643 (KLR)

Namwoso v Namwoso

Namwoso v Namwoso (Environment and Land Case E041 of 2026) [2026] KEMC 643 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Ruling)

The application failed because the applicant did not produce evidence showing the status or transfer of the appeal before the defunct Provincial Land Disputes Tribunal, the issues were already tied to pending proceedings in Bungoma CMC LDT Case No. 002 of 2008, and, in any event, the applicant sought substantive final relief in a manner the court held was procedurally improper. The application was therefore not merited and was struck out.

  • Stay of proceedings
  • Setting aside land tribunal award
  • Miscellaneous application versus substantive relief
  • Transfer of disputes from defunct tribunals
  • Unopposed applications
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2026] KEHC 13067 (KLR)

Dhuhulow & 3 others v Directorate of Criminal Investigations & 2 others

Dhuhulow & 3 others v Directorate of Criminal Investigations & 2 others (Petition E005 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 13067 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Judgment)

The dispute arose from a contractual land transaction already the subject of civil proceedings, and the Respondents failed to disclose any factual foundation linking the Petitioners to the alleged criminal offences. The Court found the investigations and threatened prosecution were being used to exert pressure in a civil dispute and therefore constituted an abuse of the criminal justice process warranting prohibition.

  • Abuse of process
  • Judicial review by prohibition
  • Police investigations
  • Prosecutorial discretion
  • Civil dispute dressed as criminal process
  • Commercial transaction dispute
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] KEHC 13061 (KLR)

Stanley & another v Republic

Stanley & another v Republic (Criminal Appeal E052 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 13061 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Judgment)

The trial court erred in law by failing to account for the 1st appellant’s pre-sentence custody period, by directing consecutive sentences for offences arising from the same single transaction, and by ordering forfeiture of USD 3,600 without proof that it was proceeds of crime or otherwise lawfully liable to forfeiture. The appeal therefore succeeded to the extent of varying the sentence and setting aside the forfeiture order.

  • Consecutive versus concurrent sentences
  • Credit for time spent in custody under section 333(2) cpc
  • Forfeiture of cash and nexus to proceeds of crime
  • Plea bargain and withdrawal of charges
  • Absolute discharge under section 35 penal code
Read case analysis
Succession law [2026] KEHC 13120 (KLR)

In re Estate of Munyora (Deceased)

In re Estate of Munyora (Deceased) (Succession Cause 13 of 1997) [2026] KEHC 13120 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Ruling)

The court found that the green card showed LR No. NKUENE/KATHERA/738 was subdivided into only two parcels, LR Nos. 3370 and 3372, and that no evidence proved any breach of the confirmed grant or malice by the respondent. Since the alleged parcel 3371 did not exist as a direct subdivision of the original parcel, the application had no merit.

  • Confirmation of grant
  • Execution of grant
  • Inhibition
  • Revocation of title
  • Subdivision of land
  • Administration of estate
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 5340 (KLR)

Republic v Deputy County Commissioner Tigania Central & 3 others; Kiunye (Ex parte Applicant)

Republic v Deputy County Commissioner Tigania Central & 3 others; Kiunye (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E021 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 5340 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Judgment)

The decision was quashed because the Minister’s delegatee committed fundamental procedural impropriety by failing to invite the ex-parte applicant to the locus-in-quo hearing, and further failed to properly complete the record by obtaining the applicant’s signature/thumbprint and capturing his name on the award. Those omissions violated the duty to afford a fair hearing and made the impugned proceedings and decision unsustainable.

  • Land adjudication
  • Certiorari
  • Fair hearing
  • Procedural impropriety
  • Ultra vires
  • Section 29 land adjudication act appeals to the minister
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2026] KEHC 12902 (KLR)

Maingi v Nairobi Java House Ltd

Maingi v Nairobi Java House Ltd (Petition E117 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 12902 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Judgment)

The Petition was struck out because the Petitioner did not first exhaust the effective statutory remedy available under the Data Protection Act by lodging a complaint with the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner. Since the claim was fundamentally a privacy/data-protection dispute under Article 31, the doctrine of exhaustion and constitutional avoidance barred the Court from reaching the merits.

  • Right to privacy
  • Human dignity
  • Use of image/personal data
  • Exhaustion doctrine
  • Constitutional avoidance
  • Jurisdiction of the high court
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] KEMC 767 (KLR)

Republic v Nyamonge & another

Republic v Nyamonge & another (Criminal Case E294 of 2026) [2026] KEMC 767 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Ruling)

The prosecution failed to adduce evidence connecting the accused persons to the theft of the generator or showing that they had access to the key or the power house, and it also failed to prove the essential element of knowledge required under section 392 of the Penal Code. No prima facie case was established on either count, so the accused were not required to enter defence and were acquitted on count two under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

  • Prima facie case
  • Burden and standard of proof
  • Stealing by servant
  • Neglect to prevent a felony
  • Submission of no case to answer
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEHC 13074 (KLR)

Ngao & another v Onyango

Ngao & another v Onyango (Civil Appeal E012 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 13074 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Judgment)

The court held that the trial magistrate did not err in apportioning liability at 50:50 because the evidence, especially PW2's inconclusive police evidence and the lack of independent corroboration, left doubt as to who caused the accident. It also held that the award of Kshs. 1,000,000 in general damages was reasonable in light of the injuries and comparable authorities, and that no proof existed to justify interference with the finding on loss of future earnings/earning capacity. The appeal and cross-appeal therefore failed.

  • Liability apportionment
  • Contributory negligence
  • Assessment of general damages
  • Loss of future earnings
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Appellate interference with damages
Read case analysis
Land law [2026] KEELC 5299 (KLR)

Kariuki v Chief Land Registrar & 6 others

Kariuki v Chief Land Registrar & 6 others (Petition 30 of 2013) [2026] KEELC 5299 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Ruling)

The court held that the appeal had been dismissed for non-attendance, no stay of execution was in force, and the respondent had not shown any effective progress or order protecting it from execution. A pending reinstatement application in the Court of Appeal did not bar the applicant from enforcing the decree. The application for eviction therefore had merit and was allowed.

  • Eviction after judgment
  • Execution of decree
  • Dismissal of appeal for non-attendance
  • Pending application for reinstatement
  • Status quo pending appeal
  • Contempt allegations
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] KEHC 12982 (KLR)

Mung’athia v Republic

Mung’athia v Republic (Criminal Appeal E018 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 12982 (KLR) (18 August 2026) (Judgment)

The appeal on conviction failed because the prosecution evidence, despite minor discrepancies, consistently established that the appellant unlawfully assaulted the deceased and that the assault caused the fatal head injury; self-defence was not available on the facts; and the alleged procedural issues did not prejudice the appellant. However, the sentence was interfered with because the original term was excessive in the circumstances, and a lower custodial term was substituted.

  • Manslaughter
  • Causation
  • Self-defence
  • Identification evidence
  • Contradictions in evidence
  • Standard of proof
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.