[2017] KEELC 596 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 596 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice of Motion dated 12/4/2017 was improperly before the court due to the absence of a notice of change of advocate, which is a fundamental procedural requirement. The court emphasized that while Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution allows for the disregard of procedural technicalities in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 596 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pamela Akinyi Bwana; Defendant: Domnicus Mail Adera; Defendant: Samson Manowa Mail; Defendant: Callmas Adera Otho; Defendant: Japheth Angila Atinga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 222 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Ruling on Procedural Objections and Directions for Hearing of Substantive Motions
Outcome
Notice of Motion dated 12/4/2017 dismissed; adjournment granted for Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2017; directions issued for submissions; status quo orders extended.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Change of Advocate Procedure, Notice of Motion, Adjournment, Status Quo Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Change of Advocate Procedure Notice of Motion Adjournment Status Quo Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pamela Akinyi Bwana

Applicant

Domnicus Mail Adera

Defendant

Samson Manowa Mail

Defendant

Callmas Adera Otho

Defendant

Japheth Angila Atinga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Ruling on Procedural Objections and Directions for Hearing of Substantive Motions

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Motion dated 12/4/2017 should be expunged for want of proper procedure regarding change of advocate.
  2. 2 Whether the application for adjournment in respect of the Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2017 should be allowed.
  3. 3 Whether directions should be given for the filing and service of submissions on the Notice of Motion dated 17/5/2016.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice of Motion dated 12/4/2017 was improperly before the court due to the absence of a notice of change of advocate, which is a fundamental procedural requirement. The court emphasized that while Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution allows for the disregard of procedural technicalities in the interest of justice, the requirement for a notice of change of advocate is not a mere technicality but a substantive step necessary for the fair administration of justice and the right to legal representation. Consequently, the Notice of Motion was dismissed. The court also considered the application for adjournment regarding the Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2017 and,...

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion dated 12/4/2017 dismissed; adjournment granted for Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2017; directions issued for submissions; status quo orders extended.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 12/4/2017 is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
  • The Notice of Motion dated 17/5/2016 to be canvassed by way of written submissions; plaintiff/applicant to file and serve submissions within 30 days; defendant/respondent to file and serve submissions within 30 days of service.