[2025] KEHC 220 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 220 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgency and an arguable case for judicial review. Accordingly, leave was granted to apply for orders of certiorari and mandamus. The court further exercised its discretion to order that the leave granted operates as a stay of the decision and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 220 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paramax Cleaning Services Limited; Respondent: Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Respondent: The Accounting Officer, Kenyatta International Convention Centre; Respondent: Kenyatta International Convention Centre
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E009 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave and Stay
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for judicial review orders; leave to operate as stay of the impugned decision; directions issued for expedited hearing.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Public Procurement, Leave to Apply, Stay of Decision
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Public Procurement Leave to Apply Stay of Decision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paramax Cleaning Services Limited

Applicant

Public Procurement Administrative Review Board

Respondent

The Accounting Officer, Kenyatta International Convention Centre

Respondent

Kenyatta International Convention Centre

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave and Stay

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and mandamus meets the threshold for urgency.
  2. 2 Whether leave should operate as a stay of the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgency and an arguable case for judicial review. Accordingly, leave was granted to apply for orders of certiorari and mandamus. The court further exercised its discretion to order that the leave granted operates as a stay of the decision and directions contained in Review decision No. 128 of 2024 made on 14/1/2025 by the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive Notice of Motion. The court issued directions for expedited filing and service of the substantive motion and responses, and set a mention date to confirm compliance.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for judicial review orders; leave to operate as stay of the impugned decision; directions issued for expedited hearing.

Orders

  • Application certified as urgent.
  • Leave granted to the applicant to apply for orders of certiorari and mandamus.