[2006] KECA 200 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the trial was a nullity because evidence was led by persons not qualified to act as prosecutors, as established in Elirema & Another v. Republic [2003] KLR. The Court further determined that a re-trial was not appropriate due to the length of time the appellant had already spent in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KECA 200 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Pascal Ouma Ogola; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 114 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in the High Court
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- J Wakiaga
- Legal Topics
- Unqualified Prosecution, Nullity of Trial, Retrial Principles, Identification Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pascal Ouma Ogola
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial was a nullity due to unqualified persons acting as prosecutors.
- 2 Whether a re-trial should be ordered given the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the trial was a nullity because evidence was led by persons not qualified to act as prosecutors, as established in Elirema & Another v. Republic [2003] KLR. The Court further determined that a re-trial was not appropriate due to the length of time the appellant had already spent in custody, the age of the case, and the likelihood that witnesses could not be traced or would not have reliable recollection of the events. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence were quashed, and the appellant was ordered to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The judgment of the superior court delivered on 6th March, 2003 is set aside.
- The conviction is quashed and the sentence imposed on the appellant is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
CRIMINAL APPEAL 114 OF 2006
PASCAL OUMA OGOLA ……..............................................………….. APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ……………………….......................................……………RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Tanui & Gacheche, JJ) dated 6th March, 2003
in
H.C.CR.A. NOS. 303 – 306 OF 2001)
*****************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (B. K. Tanui and J.W. Gacheche JJ) dated 6th March, 2003 in Criminal Appeal No. 304 of 2001.
The appellant is Pascal Ouma Ogola. Mr. D. I. Musau Senior Principal State Counsel appeared for the State. At the outset of the hearing Mr. Musau stated that he would concede the appeal due to persons unqualified to act as prosecutors having so acted at several stages in the proceedings.
The record makes it clear that the evidence of PW1 was led by P.C. Wanyonyi and the evidence of PW4 was led by Corporal Nyongesa. We agree with Mr. Musau that in these circumstances the trial was a nullity following the decision of this Court in Elirema & Another v. Republic [2003] KLR.
We have considered whether or not we should order a re-trial. The alleged offences were committed on 9th February, 2000 and the appellant has already been in custody for 5 years. The main critical issues amongst others at the hearing of the first appeal to the superior court were as to identification and recognition in circumstances in which both the State Counsel and the court found not to be favourable for identification in respect of the other appellants who were set at liberty. It may well prove impossible to trace the witnesses and those that are traced may not have accurate memory of the details of the events. We agree with Mr. Musau that this is not a suitable case in which to order a re-trial.
We therefore order that the judgment of the superior court delivered on 6th March, 2003 be and is hereby set aside and we quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant.
The appellant Pascal Ouma Ogola shall be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 23rd day of June, 2006.
P. K. TUNOI
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P. N. WAKI
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
W. S. DEVERELL
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR