[2019] KEHC 6129 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons or evidence to justify the transfer of his case from Mumias Law Courts. There was no proof that all magistrates at Mumias had handled his matter, nor had the applicant sought recusal of the current magistrate. On the issue of bail, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 6129 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Pasiliano Makaye Lukungu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 38 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Case and Bail Terms
- Outcome
- Application for transfer declined; cash bail granted.
- Judges
- CM Njagi
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Transfer of Criminal Cases, Constitutional Rights of Accused
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pasiliano Makaye Lukungu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Case and Bail Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's constitutional right to bail under Article 49(h) of the Constitution was violated.
- 2 Whether sufficient grounds exist to transfer Mumias Criminal Case No. 819 of 2010 to another subordinate court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons or evidence to justify the transfer of his case from Mumias Law Courts. There was no proof that all magistrates at Mumias had handled his matter, nor had the applicant sought recusal of the current magistrate. On the issue of bail, the court held that the applicant's right to bail had not been violated, as he was previously granted bond but his surety withdrew. The court determined there was no valid reason to deny the applicant cash bail, and speculation about his failure to attend court was insufficient to refuse bail. Accordingly, the application for transfer was declined, but the applicant was granted cash bail of...
Court Disposition
Application for transfer declined; cash bail granted.
Orders
- Application for transfer of Mumias Criminal Case No. 819 of 2010 is declined.
- Applicant is granted cash bail of Ksh. 50,000 in Mumias Criminal Case No. 819 of 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2018
PASILIANO MAKAYE LUKUNGU......................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant herein is facing a charge of obtaining by false pretences at Mumias Law Courts. He has filed an undated application seeking that:-
(1) This court be pleased to make a finding that the accused’s rights to be released on bond as provided by article 49 (h) of the Constitution of Kenya were seriously prejudiced.
(2) This court be pleased to order that Mumias file No. 819 of 2010 be transferred to any other subordinate court within the country.
2. The application was supported by the affidavit of the applicant in which he states that he was charged with an offence of obtaining by false pretences. That he was denied bond in the case. That his rights have thereby been violated.
3. The application was opposed by the learned state counsel Mr. Ng’etich who stated that the application does not give reasons why the case should be transferred from Mumias Law Courts. That Mumias court has 3 magistrates. That the applicant could have made an application to be heard by any other magistrate at the station. That it will inconvenience the prosecution to present the witnesses to another court. That the applicant was granted bond. The surety withdrew. Therefore that he has the option of getting another surety. That it is not proper to release him on cash bail as he may not turn up.
4. In reply the applicant says that all the three courts at Mumias Law Courts have done his case. That the case started in 2010.
5. I have considered the application. The applicant has indeed not given a good reason why the case should be transferred from Mumias Law Courts. He has not made any application to the magistrate handling the case to recuse herself from the case. There is no evidence that all the three magistrates at Mumias Law Courts have handled his case. The application for the transfer of the case is therefore declined.
6. The applicant was released on bond. His surety withdrew. It is the duty of the applicant to procure another surety. However, there is no reason for the applicant being denied cash bail. That he will not turn up for hearing if released on cash bail is mere speculation. I therefore grant the applicant cash bail of Ksh. 50,000/= in Mumias Criminal Case No. 819 of 2010.
7. The matter to proceed before the current magistrate who is hearing the matter.
Orders accordingly.
Delivered, dated and signed in open court at Kakamega this 30th day of May, 2019.
J. NJAGI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Juma for Respondent/State
Appellant - present
Court Assistant - George