[1987] KECA 21 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the contract between the appellant and respondent, both Kenyan residents, for the lending of Indian Rupees in India was illegal and unenforceable under section 3(1) of the Exchange Control Act (cap 113). The Act expressly prohibits, without ministerial consent, any resident of Kenya...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1987] KECA 21 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Patel; Respondent: Singh
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 1 July 1987
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 64 of 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- EN Juma, JM Gachuhi, FK Apaloo
- Legal Topics
- Illegality of Contract, Exchange Control Regulations, Unenforceability of Contracts, Foreign Currency Transactions
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patel
Appellant
Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contract between Kenyan residents for the lending of foreign currency outside Kenya is illegal and unenforceable under section 3(1) of the Exchange Control Act.
- 2 Whether the exemption in Exchange Control Circular No. 32 applies to the transaction in question.
- 3 Whether the court can enforce a contract made illegal by statute.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the contract between the appellant and respondent, both Kenyan residents, for the lending of Indian Rupees in India was illegal and unenforceable under section 3(1) of the Exchange Control Act (cap 113). The Act expressly prohibits, without ministerial consent, any resident of Kenya from lending or borrowing foreign currency outside Kenya except through an authorized dealer. The exemption in Exchange Control Circular No. 32 only regularized the transfer of funds for investment in the sterling area prior to a certain date and did not permit private lending of foreign currency between residents. The court further held that, regardless of the parties' knowledge...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment