[1990] KECA 36 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the only issue of law raised was that of identification. Both the trial court and the first appellate court found as a fact that the complainant and her daughter knew each appellant prior to the incident. The court found that there was sufficient lighting in the complainant's house...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1990] KECA 36 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Patrick Adambu Wasio & Others; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 24 of 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- EN Juma, JM Gachuhi, AM Cockar
- Legal Topics
- Identification by Recognition, Robbery With Violence, Rape, Evidence Evaluation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Adambu Wasio & Others
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants were properly identified by recognition during the commission of the offences.
- 2 Whether the convictions for robbery and rape were supported by sufficient evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the only issue of law raised was that of identification. Both the trial court and the first appellate court found as a fact that the complainant and her daughter knew each appellant prior to the incident. The court found that there was sufficient lighting in the complainant's house during the commission of the offences, and that the identification was by recognition, which is more reliable. The complainant's testimony was corroborated by her daughter, and part of the stolen property was found in possession of two appellants. There was also unchallenged medical evidence supporting the charge of rape. The court concluded that the convictions were supported by...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Each of the four appellants' appeals is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: NYARANGI, GACHUHI & COCKAR JJA)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 24 OF 1990
PATRICK ADAMBU WASIO & OTHERS...............APPELLANT
V
REPUBLIC.............................................................DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
On December 7, 1990, Nyarangi, Gachuhi & Cockar JJA delivered the following Judgment.
This is a second appeal and so only issue of law fall to be raised. The only issue of law which has been urged by each appellant is that of identification. The trial court and the first appellate court have made concurrent findings of fact that the complainant knew each appellant prior to the material day. On the evidence on record, there is sound evidence in support of that finding. We do not accept that there has been any misdirection as regards the identification by recognation. There was light inside the complainant’s house before the four appellants forcibly gained entry into the house. There was light all the time the appellants remained within the house. Neither the complainant nor her daughter attempted to resist. So, the conditions for the identification by recognition existed and the result is, as the lower courts have held, positive identification. The complainant and her daughter knew each appellant prior to that day.
The complainant’s testimony of the robbery and of rape corroborated that of her fourteenyear old daughter.
There can be no question that part of the property of the complainant which had just been taken from her house during the robbery were found in possession of Patrick Adambu Wasio and Aggrey Auko Akech. Also there is unchallenged medical evidence in support of the charge of rape.
In our judgment, the convictions are supported by evidence which is easy to appreciate and to accept.
The sentences imposed are lawful.
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that each of the four appellants’ appeal be and is dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 7th day of December, 1990.
NYARANGI ...................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
GACHUHI .......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
COCKAR .............................. JUDGE OF APPEAL