[2021] KEHC 13630 (KLR)
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu applies only to mandatory death sentences for murder under section 204 of the Penal Code and does not extend to other offences with mandatory sentences, such as defilement under the Sexual Offences Act. Furthermore, the High Court, having already...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 13630 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Patrick Gembe Maganga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition 16 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Post Conviction Resentencing Application
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Defilement Offence, Mandatory Sentencing, Jurisdiction of High Court, Constitutionality of Sentences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Gembe Maganga
Petitioner
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Post Conviction Resentencing Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu applies to mandatory sentences for defilement under the Sexual Offences Act.
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a resentencing petition after having determined the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu applies only to mandatory death sentences for murder under section 204 of the Penal Code and does not extend to other offences with mandatory sentences, such as defilement under the Sexual Offences Act. Furthermore, the High Court, having already determined the petitioner's appeal, is functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to entertain a resentencing petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of jurisdiction and lack of merit regarding the applicability of Muruatetu.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT HOMA BAY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16 OF 2019
PATRICK GEMBE MAGANGA...............................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC................................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Patrick Gembe Maganga, the petitioner herein, were convicted for the offence of defilement contrary to 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act and sentenced to serve twenty years imprisonment. He appealed to the High Court and to the Court of Appeal where both appeals were dismissed.
2. The petitioner was in person. His petition is premised on the ground that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR, the mandatory sentence is unconstitutional. He is therefore praying for an order for resentencing.
3. The petitioner premised their petition on Articles 25 (c) 27(1) & (2), 28 and 50 (2) (p) of the Constitution of Kenya.
4. The Muruatetu case is the most misapplied and at times I am tempted to believe that it is deliberate. At paragraph 112 the Supreme Court summarized its orders which captured their decision as follows:
[112]Accordingly, with regards to the claims of the petitioners in this case, the Court makes the following Orders:
a) The mandatory nature of the death sentence as provided for under Section 204 of the Penal Code is hereby declared unconstitutional. For the avoidance of doubt, this order does not disturb the validity of the death sentence as contemplated under Article 26(3) of the Constitution.
b) This matter is hereby remitted to the High Court for re- hearing on sentence only, on a priority basis, and in conformity with this judgment.
c) The Attorney General, the Director of Public Prosecutions and other relevant agencies shall prepare a detailed professional review in the context of this Judgment and Order made with a view to setting up a framework to deal with sentence re-hearing cases similar to that of the petitioners herein. The Attorney General is hereby granted twelve (12) months from the date of this Judgment to give a progress report to this Court on the same.
d) We direct that this Judgment be placed before the Speakers of the National Assembly and the Senate, the Attorney-General, and the Kenya Law Reform Commission, attended with a signal of the utmost urgency, for any necessary amendments, formulation and enactment of statute law, to give effect to this judgment on the mandatory nature of the death sentence and the parameters of what ought constitute life imprisonment.
5. The decision addressed itself to murder cases and not any other mandatory sentence. It is therefore inapplicable in this case.
6. This court (differently constituted) became functus officio the moment it pronounced itself on appeal. I therefore lack jurisdiction to entertain the petition. I accordingly dismiss it.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE