[2018] KEELC 2706 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2706 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant applied for copies of the judgment promptly, five days after delivery, and that the delay in filing the appeal was attributable to the late supply of proceedings, as confirmed by the certificate of delay. The applicant demonstrated vigilance and did not act inordinately. Therefore,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2706 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Gitonga M'Ikiara; Respondent: Ruthson Mangati M'Ikiara; Respondent: Hudson Muriira M'Ikiara; Respondent: Solomon Mbaabu M'Ikiara; Respondent: Moses Koome; Respondent: Japhet Murira M'Ikiara; Respondent: Moses Ndubi alias Jomo M'Ikiara
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 8 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Delay in Proceedings, Judgment Delivery, Appeal Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Delay in Proceedings Judgment Delivery Appeal Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Gitonga M'Ikiara

Applicant

Ruthson Mangati M'Ikiara

Respondent

Hudson Muriira M'Ikiara

Respondent

Solomon Mbaabu M'Ikiara

Respondent

Moses Koome

Respondent

Japhet Murira M'Ikiara

Respondent

Moses Ndubi alias Jomo M'Ikiara

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant applied for copies of the judgment promptly, five days after delivery, and that the delay in filing the appeal was attributable to the late supply of proceedings, as confirmed by the certificate of delay. The applicant demonstrated vigilance and did not act inordinately. Therefore, sufficient cause was established to warrant the grant of leave to appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file and serve the appeal out of time and not later than 7 days from the date of this ruling, failing which the application will stand as dismissed.
  • Costs in the cause.