[2017] KEHC 8645 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, having been convicted on his own plea of guilty for burglary and stealing, was a first offender and had served a significant portion of his sentence. The probation officer's report was favourable, indicating the applicant's potential for rehabilitation and strong family support....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 8645 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Patrick Irungu Thuku; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 78 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- Custodial sentence set aside and substituted with probation.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Revision, Burglary, Handling Stolen Goods, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Irungu Thuku
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial sentence imposed on the applicant was correct, legal, and regular.
- 2 Whether the applicant, as a first offender and sole breadwinner, should be granted a non-custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, having been convicted on his own plea of guilty for burglary and stealing, was a first offender and had served a significant portion of his sentence. The probation officer's report was favourable, indicating the applicant's potential for rehabilitation and strong family support. The court determined that, in these circumstances, a non-custodial sentence was more appropriate than continued imprisonment. Accordingly, the custodial sentence was set aside and substituted with an 18-month probation order, with the applicant to report to the Nakuru Sub-County Probation Office.
Court Disposition
Custodial sentence set aside and substituted with probation.
Orders
- The custodial sentence of seven years imprisonment is set aside.
- The applicant shall serve a probation term of 18 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 78 of 2015
PATRICK IRUNGU THUKU.…………………………………..APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………………………..…..RESPONDENT
RULING
The lower court file in Senior Principal Magistrate’s at Githunguri Cr. Case No. 1438 of 2014 has been forwarded to this court with a view to the court satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality and regularity of the sentence passed. The application is brought pursuant to Section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The Applicant herein was charged with the offence of burglary contrary toSection 304(2) and Stealing contrary to Section 279(b) of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence were that on the night of 20th November, 2014 at Kiaria Village in Githunguri District within Kiambu County, broke and entered into the dwelling house of Samuel Mwithikia with intent to steal therein and did steal from therein LG home theatre, Samsung TV 20”, Samsung phone, 6 kgs meko gas cylinder, microwave and 13 kgs gas cylinder all valued at Kshs. 78,000/, the properties of the said Samuel Mwithikia.
In the alternative, he was charged with handling stolen goods contrary to Section 322(1)(2) of the Penal Code in that on the 20th day of December, 2014 at unknown time at Gathanje trading centre in Githunguri Sub-County within Kiambu Country, otherwise than in the course of stealing, dishonestly retained Samsung mobile phone worth Kshs. 5,300 knowing or having reason to believe it to be stolen goods.
The Applicant was convicted on his own plea of guilty in the main charge. He was sentenced to serve seven (7) years imprisonment. As at the date of hearing this application, the Applicant had served two years and six months of the jail term. His plea to this court is that the sentence be revised to a non-custodial one as he is the sole bread winner of a young family of two school going children and a house wife.
This court called for a Probation Officer’s Report (P.O.R) which was presented to the court on 14th March, 2017. The same is favourable to the Applicant. It indicates that the Applicant may have slid into the criminal world due to bad company and a break-up of a marital union where he was splashed with money. Although he studied up to standard seven (7), since 2000, he lived with a High School teacher as husband and wife. The partner gave him a lot of money but the two broke up when she refused to sire children for him despite the fact that she had three children of her own. That is when he moved to Githunguri where until his arrest was doing menial jobs. He has a family of parents and siblings who are ready to receive him back and assist him in re-organizing himself.
In the above circumstances, more so taking into account that the Applicant is a first offender, I would prefer a non-custodial sentence. In the result, I set aside the custodial sentence. I substitute it with an order that the Applicant shall serve a probation term of 18 months. He shall report to Nakuru Sub-County Probation Office for this purpose. It is so ordered.
DATED and DELIVERED in Nairobi this 21st day of March, 2017
G.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
1. Applicant in person.
2. Miss Sigei for the Respondent.