[2020] KEELC 1425 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1425 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the suit properties and that the application demonstrated sufficient urgency and a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The court was persuaded that, at the ex parte stage, it was necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1425 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Kathurima Njiru; Respondent: Richard Kiriinya Muriungi; Respondent: Doris Kathambi Muriungi; Respondent: Peter Marete; Respondent: Faith Muthoni Njiru; Respondent: Land Registrar; Respondent: Meru District Land Registry
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 28 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
interim injunction granted ex parte; matter certified urgent
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Land Title Disputes, Possession and Eviction
Source Language
en
Land and Property Temporary Injunctions Land Title Disputes Possession and Eviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Kathurima Njiru

Applicant

Richard Kiriinya Muriungi

Respondent

Doris Kathambi Muriungi

Respondent

Peter Marete

Respondent

Faith Muthoni Njiru

Respondent

Land Registrar

Respondent

Meru District Land Registry

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the suit properties pending hearing and determination of the application.
  2. 2 Whether the matter is urgent and warrants ex parte orders at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the suit properties and that the application demonstrated sufficient urgency and a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The court was persuaded that, at the ex parte stage, it was necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent possible irreparable harm to the applicant's interests in the properties. Accordingly, the court certified the matter as urgent and granted the temporary injunction as sought in prayer 2 of the application, restraining the 1st to 4th respondents from entering, threatening eviction, demolishing buildings, occupying, or undertaking any activity on the specified parcels of land pending...

Court Disposition

interim injunction granted ex parte; matter certified urgent

Orders

  • Prayer 2 in the application is granted: a temporary injunction restraining the 1st to 4th respondents from entering, threatening eviction of tenants, demolishing buildings, occupying or undertaking any activity on Title Numbers Nyaki/Mulathankari/3702, Nyaki/Mulathankari/3703, and Nyaki/Kithoka/4742 pending inter...
  • Application to be placed before Hon. Justice Lucy Mbugua, ELC Judge, at Meru on 18th August, 2020.