[2010] KEHC 1611 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 1611 (KLR)

The court held that, having already dismissed the applications for leave to appeal out of time, it lacked jurisdiction under Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code or any other law to revise its own order of dismissal. The applicant's request for revision was therefore not tenable, and the application was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 1611 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Leshore; Respondent: Moses Karanja Machaira; Respondent: Jeniffer Malito Lekisaat; Respondent: Nyaweka Mucheka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 343 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Order Dismissing Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Revision Jurisdiction, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Acquittal, Powers of High Court
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Revision Jurisdiction Leave to Appeal Out of Time Acquittal Powers of High Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Leshore

Applicant

Moses Karanja Machaira

Respondent

Jeniffer Malito Lekisaat

Respondent

Nyaweka Mucheka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Order Dismissing Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction under Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code to revise its own order dismissing an application for leave to appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to revision of the order dismissing the application for leave to appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, having already dismissed the applications for leave to appeal out of time, it lacked jurisdiction under Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code or any other law to revise its own order of dismissal. The applicant's request for revision was therefore not tenable, and the application was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.