[2016] KEHC 3737 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3737 (KLR)

The court found that the restraining orders previously issued applied only to the prosecution of the Applicant and Interested Parties, not to the implementation of the Mombasa County Liquor Licensing Act 2014. Since the substantive issues had already been determined in the main judgment, any pending applications,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 3737 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Mukiri Kabundu; Respondent: The Executive in Charge of Tourism Development and Culture, Mombasa County; Respondent: The County Government of Mombasa; Respondent: The Mombasa County Directorate Liquor Control; Plaintiff: Davies Mwasi Kiondo & 5 Others (on behalf of Mombasa County Bars, Hotels, Restaurants and Guest Houses Welfare Group); Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 27 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application Post Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Contempt of Court, Liquor Licensing, Fair Administrative Action
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Judicial Review Contempt of Court Liquor Licensing Fair Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Mukiri Kabundu

Applicant

The Executive in Charge of Tourism Development and Culture, Mombasa County

Respondent

The County Government of Mombasa

Respondent

The Mombasa County Directorate Liquor Control

Respondent

Davies Mwasi Kiondo & 5 Others (on behalf of Mombasa County Bars, Hotels, Restaurants and Guest Houses Welfare Group)

Plaintiff

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application Post Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondents were in contempt of court for allegedly disobeying restraining orders issued by the court.
  2. 2 Whether the restraining orders applied to the implementation of the Mombasa County Liquor Licensing Act 2014 or only to prosecution of the Applicant and Interested Parties.
  3. 3 Whether the contempt application was competent after the substantive matters had been determined by judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the restraining orders previously issued applied only to the prosecution of the Applicant and Interested Parties, not to the implementation of the Mombasa County Liquor Licensing Act 2014. Since the substantive issues had already been determined in the main judgment, any pending applications, including the contempt application, were rendered incompetent. The court held that there was no merit in the contempt application as the alleged disobedience did not fall within the scope of the restraining orders. Consequently, the application for contempt was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for contempt is dismissed.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.