[2021] KEHC 1749 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1749 (KLR)

The court held that the application for review of sentence based on the Muruatetu decision was incompetent because the Supreme Court had clarified that its decision on the unconstitutionality of mandatory sentences applied only to murder cases under section 204 of the Penal Code. The applicant, having been convicted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1749 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Munyangoli Ombati; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E066 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/abuse of Process
Outcome
application struck out as abuse of process
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Mandatory Sentences, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Mandatory Sentences Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Munyangoli Ombati

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/abuse of Process

  1. 1 Whether the application for sentence review based on the Muruatetu decision is competent where the offence is not murder.
  2. 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of court process due to duplicity.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application for review of sentence based on the Muruatetu decision was incompetent because the Supreme Court had clarified that its decision on the unconstitutionality of mandatory sentences applied only to murder cases under section 204 of the Penal Code. The applicant, having been convicted of robbery with violence under section 296(2) of the Penal Code, could not rely on Muruatetu for sentence review. Furthermore, the court found that the present application was a duplicate of an earlier application filed by the same applicant arising from the same proceedings, and thus constituted an abuse of court process. Consequently, the application was struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out as abuse of process

Orders

  • The application is struck out as an abuse of court process.
  • The Deputy Registrar shall cause copies of this ruling to be availed to the applicant and the office of Director of Public Prosecutions, Kakamega.