[2016] KEELRC 1720 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1720 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was not given an opportunity to be heard or to explain his absence before dismissal, contrary to the requirements of the Employment Act. The respondent failed to file a defence or provide any evidence to counter the claimant's assertions. The claimant produced medical evidence to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1720 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Patrick Nangala Juma; Respondent: Radar Security Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 939 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimant as prayed.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Summary Dismissal, Terminal Benefits, Certificate of Service, Service Pay, House Allowance
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Summary Dismissal Terminal Benefits Certificate of Service Service Pay House Allowance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Nangala Juma

Claimant

Radar Security Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully dismissed from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal benefits and compensation for unlawful termination.
  3. 3 Whether due process was followed in the claimant's dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was not given an opportunity to be heard or to explain his absence before dismissal, contrary to the requirements of the Employment Act. The respondent failed to file a defence or provide any evidence to counter the claimant's assertions. The claimant produced medical evidence to justify his absence and demonstrated that he had reported back for redeployment. The court held that the dismissal was procedurally unfair and unlawful. Consequently, the claimant was entitled to compensation for unlawful termination, payment in lieu of notice, house allowance, service pay, issuance of a correct certificate of service, and costs of the suit.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimant as prayed.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant one month's salary in lieu of notice (KES 13,310).
  • Respondent to pay claimant house allowance at 15% of salary for 3 years (KES 240,300).