[2016] KEHC 5847 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 5847 (KLR)

The court determined that, since the parties have repeatedly failed to agree on the appointment of administrators as previously ordered, it is necessary for the court to intervene to ensure the proper administration of the estate. The court directed each side to file a list of three proposed administrators within...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 5847 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Patrick Ng’olua M’Mungania; Applicant: Fredrick Kimathi Ng’olua; Applicant: Francis Kirimi Ntorukiri; Applicant: Rebecca Ciorui M’Rukiri; Applicant: Joshua Mutuma M’Mungania; Applicant: Kiurumwitika Ciuki; Applicant: Gladys Kathubaru; Applicant: James Gitonga; Applicant: Cypriano Kaberia; Applicant: Eliud Gitonga Ntorukiri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 535 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Appointment of Administrators
Outcome
Parties directed to file separate lists of three proposed administrators within seven days; failing which, the court will appoint administrators under section 66 of the Law of Succession Act.
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Appointment of Administrators, Law of Succession Act, Confirmation of Grant, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Appointment of Administrators Law of Succession Act Confirmation of Grant Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Ng’olua M’Mungania

Petitioner

Fredrick Kimathi Ng’olua

Applicant

Francis Kirimi Ntorukiri

Applicant

Rebecca Ciorui M’Rukiri

Applicant

Joshua Mutuma M’Mungania

Applicant

Kiurumwitika Ciuki

Applicant

Gladys Kathubaru

Applicant

James Gitonga

Applicant

Cypriano Kaberia

Applicant

Eliud Gitonga Ntorukiri

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Appointment of Administrators

  1. 1 Whether the court should appoint administrators for the estate given the parties' failure to agree on suitable persons.
  2. 2 What procedure should be followed for the appointment of administrators in the absence of consensus among parties.
  3. 3 Whether filings on mode of distribution are valid in the absence of appointed administrators.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, since the parties have repeatedly failed to agree on the appointment of administrators as previously ordered, it is necessary for the court to intervene to ensure the proper administration of the estate. The court directed each side to file a list of three proposed administrators within seven days, failing which the court will exercise its discretion under section 66 of the Law of Succession Act to appoint administrators in the best interests of all concerned. The court emphasized that no further steps regarding confirmation or distribution of the estate can be taken until administrators are appointed, as filings on distribution without administrators are...

Court Disposition

Parties directed to file separate lists of three proposed administrators within seven days; failing which, the court will appoint administrators under section 66 of the Law of Succession Act.

Orders

  • Each party to file a list of three proposed administrators within seven days.
  • If any party fails to file, the court will appoint administrators under section 66 of the Law of Succession Act.