[2018] KEHC 5567 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5567 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to attach the proceedings of the Auctioneers Licensing Board or provide an affidavit from his lawyer to substantiate claims of being denied a hearing or receiving the decision late. This material non-disclosure meant the court could not verify the applicant's assertions. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5567 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick O. Barongo t/a Bama Auctioneers; Respondent: Arison Omwenga Abel
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Case 06 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
EM Muchoki
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Disciplinary Proceedings, Material Non Disclosure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Disciplinary Proceedings Material Non Disclosure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick O. Barongo t/a Bama Auctioneers

Applicant

Arison Omwenga Abel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the decision of the Auctioneers Licensing Board.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the Board's decision should be granted pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to attach the proceedings of the Auctioneers Licensing Board or provide an affidavit from his lawyer to substantiate claims of being denied a hearing or receiving the decision late. This material non-disclosure meant the court could not verify the applicant's assertions. The delay of four months in bringing the application was deemed inordinate. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 8th May, 2018 is dismissed.
  • The applicant shall bear the costs of the application.