[2019] KEELRC 786 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 786 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant failed to prove that he was owed terminal dues by the respondent. The payslip produced by the respondent was not challenged by the claimant, and as an NSSF contributor, the claimant was not entitled to service pay unless there was an express agreement or CBA, which was not produced....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 786 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Patrick Opondo; Respondent: Inter Security Service Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1799 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed with costs
Judges
DI Wasike
Legal Topics
Terminal Dues, Service Pay, Leave Entitlement, Nssf Contributions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Terminal Dues Service Pay Leave Entitlement Nssf Contributions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Opondo

Claimant

Inter Security Service Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to terminal dues upon resignation.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to service pay despite being an NSSF contributor.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent paid all terminal dues owed to the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant failed to prove that he was owed terminal dues by the respondent. The payslip produced by the respondent was not challenged by the claimant, and as an NSSF contributor, the claimant was not entitled to service pay unless there was an express agreement or CBA, which was not produced. Consequently, the claim was not proved as required by law and was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed with costs to the respondent.