[2018] KEELRC 2193 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2193 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was dismissed without notice or a hearing, in violation of sections 35 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The respondents did not contest the claimant's evidence. The court held that the termination was unfair and, applying the relevant statutory provisions, awarded the claimant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2193 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Patrick Ouma Were; Respondent: Jack Ingolo Peter; Respondent: Samson Gwanda; Respondent: Kibera Matatu Owners Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1295 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment After Formal Proof; Undefended Cause
Outcome
Claim allowed; judgment for the claimant for unfair termination and monetary awards.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice and Hearing, Service Pay, Compensation for Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice and Hearing Service Pay Compensation for Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Ouma Were

Claimant

Jack Ingolo Peter

Respondent

Samson Gwanda

Respondent

Kibera Matatu Owners Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment After Formal Proof; Undefended Cause

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair.
  2. 2 What remedies are appropriate for the claimant if unfair termination is established.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was dismissed without notice or a hearing, in violation of sections 35 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The respondents did not contest the claimant's evidence. The court held that the termination was unfair and, applying the relevant statutory provisions, awarded the claimant one month’s salary in lieu of notice, service pay for completed years of service, and compensation equivalent to four months’ gross wages. The court also directed the respondents to issue a certificate of service as required by law.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; judgment for the claimant for unfair termination and monetary awards.

Orders

  • Respondents to pay the claimant Kshs 18,000 as salary in lieu of notice.
  • Respondents to pay the claimant Kshs 36,000 as service pay.