[2019] KEELRC 1198 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case with a probability of success that his contract as General Administrator of PAG-K Church was renewed by the Executive Committee, as supported by the affidavit of the General Superintendent and the correspondence on record. The court noted the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1198 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rev. Patrick Oyondi; Respondent: Rev. Patrick Lihanda; Respondent: Rev. Elisha Kimaiyo; Respondent: Rev. Zedekiah Orena
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 214 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- interlocutory injunction granted
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Injunctive Relief, Employment Contracts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rev. Patrick Oyondi
Applicant
Rev. Patrick Lihanda
Respondent
Rev. Elisha Kimaiyo
Respondent
Rev. Zedekiah Orena
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an injunction restraining his removal from office pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the applicant's employment contract as General Administrator of PAG-K Church was validly renewed.
- 3 Whether the respondents followed due process in seeking to remove the applicant from office.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case with a probability of success that his contract as General Administrator of PAG-K Church was renewed by the Executive Committee, as supported by the affidavit of the General Superintendent and the correspondence on record. The court noted the contradiction between the General Secretary's position and that of the Executive Committee, which is the supreme management body under the church constitution. Applying the principles in Giella v Cassman Brown Ltd, the court held that the balance of convenience favoured the applicant remaining in office pending the hearing and determination of the suit, as removal at this stage...
Court Disposition
interlocutory injunction granted
Orders
- The applicant shall remain in office as General Administrator of PAG-K Church pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- The interim orders previously granted are to remain in force until final determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT KISUMU
CASE NO. 214 OF 2018
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)
REV. PATRICK OYONDI............................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REV PATRICK LIHANDA...............................................1ST RESPONDENT
REV. ELISHA KIMAIYO................................................2ND RESPONDENT
REV. ZEDEKIAH ORENA..............................................3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Application dated 13th June 2018 sought orders inter alia staying the 3rd respondent’s letter dated 25th May 2018 and that the claimant/Applicant remain in office pending hearing and determination of the suit. The Applicant obtained exparte interim order that are still in place.
2. The Application is based on grounds set out in the Notice of Motion the nub of which is that the respondents are engaged in the removal of the claimant from office as the General Administrator of PAG-K Church for no valid reasons and without following a fair procedure.
3. The impugned letter produced by the Applicant dated 25th May 2018, informs the claimant that he was appointed on a seven (7) year fixed contract with effect from 1st May 2011 and that the contract ended on 1st May 2018. The claimant was directed to handover the office to the General Treasurer to whom he reports immediately since he had not done so by 31st May 2018.
4. This application was filed on 13th June 2018 past the handing over date. The Applicant had instead written a letter dated 29th May 2018 to the General Secretary, PAG-K Rev. Dr. Zedekiah M. Orena informing him that he would not hand over since the contents of the letter dated 25th May 2018 have been overtaken by events and that the matter of the employment of the claimant was the subject of PAG (K) Appeals and Arbitration Tribunal Dispute No. 5 of 2018 and the General Secretary PAG-K was a party to that dispute which was due for hearing on 15th June 2018.
5. The Applicant relies on another letter dated 28th May 2018 written by Rev. Patrick Lihanda, General Superintendent PAG-K to the Secretary PAG-K, Rev. Dr. Zedekiah Orena, in which the superintendent informs the General Secretary that from his position as the head of PAG-K Church and the Chairman of the Executive Committee,
“The term of office of the General Administrator, Rev. Patrick Oyondi was validly renewed as provided for in the Pentecostal Assemblies of God – K (1998) constitution.
6. The General Secretary was cautioned to countercheck matters with the office of the superintendent, PAG-K and the chairman of the Executive committee before writing letters such as the one dated 25th May 2018 to the claimant.
7. The General superintendent and Head of the Pentecostal Assemblies of God Kenya has also deposed to an affidavit sworn on 9th July 2018 and filed on 27th January 2018 in which he states that the contract of the claimant/Applicant that was to end in May 2018 had since been renewed by the Executive Committee of P.A.G Kenya Church.
8. The replying affidavit of Rev. Dr. Zedekiah Orena, the General Secretary, contradicts the evidence by his superior the Superintendent and Head of the Pentecostal Assemblies of God Kenya and the Executive committee which under Article 10 of the Pentecostal Assemblies of God – Kenya, Constitution (1998) is “the Supreme Management Committee of the church”
9. The Applicant in the court’s considered view has satisfied the requirements for grant of an injunction pending the hearing and determination of the suit set out in a case of Giella vs Casman Brown Ltd.
10. The Claimant/Applicant has made out a prima facie case with a probability of success that he still validly holds office as the General Administrator of PAG-K Church upon renewal of his contract by the Executive Committee of the Church.
11. These facts in dispute shall be fully determined upon hearing the suit on the merits.
12. The balance of convenience however is in favour of the Claimant/Applicant remaining in office until the matter is finalized. Costs in the cause.
Ruling Dated, Signed and delivered this 9th day of July, 2019
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Appearances
Mr. Athung’a for Claimant/Applicant.
M/S Omollo for 1st Respondent.
Mr. Wasilwa for 2nd and 3rd Respondents.
Chrispo – Court Clerk