[2014] KEHC 4865 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success. Upon reviewing the evidence, the court concluded that there were no unusual or exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of bail pending appeal. Additionally, there was no demonstration of anticipated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 4865 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Patrick Sukwa Ngila; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 151 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Grounds for Bail, Conviction and Sentence, Prospects of Success
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Sukwa Ngila
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether there are exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying release on bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success. Upon reviewing the evidence, the court concluded that there were no unusual or exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of bail pending appeal. Additionally, there was no demonstration of anticipated delay in the hearing of the appeal. Therefore, the application for bail pending appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
NO. 266/2014
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 151 OF 2013
PATRICK SUKWA NGILA ……………………...APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …..................….............................. RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
The application dated 27th August 2013 brought by way of Notice of Motion pursuant to the Provisions of Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code is for bail pending appeal. It is premised on grounds that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success; the conviction and subsequent sentence imposed by the trial court is illegal; and the applicant is ready to abide with bail terms to be imposed.
The application was canvassed by way of written submissions. In his submissions, counsel for the applicant stated that the appeal has an overwhelming chance of succeeding because there was a miscarriage of justice and the evidence adduced did not support the charge.
In a response thereto the state opposed the application. It was argued that the applicant had not demonstrated that the case had a high chance of succeeding; the sentence meted out was within the law and not excessive.
Rival submissions of both counsels have been considered. Conditions to be satisfied by the applicant to be released on bail have been considered in the case of Somo versus Republic 1972 E.A. 476 where it was held thus:
“The most important ground is that the appeal has an overwhelming chance of being successful; in that case there is no justification for depriving the applicant of his freedom.”
It has also been held that anticipated delay in hearing of the appeal together with other factors constitute good grounds for granting bail pending appeal (See Chimambai versus Republic E.A. 343).
The applicant herein was tried and convicted of the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm. The charge of assault was substituted by one of grievous harm contrary toSection 234of the Penal Code on the 8th May 2013. This court will have a duty of making the necessary amendment/verification/alteration as provided by the law. Looking at the evidence adduced, it cannot be stated that the appeal has a high chance of succeeding. No circumstances that are unusual have been brought to the attention of this court that would call for release of the applicant on bail pending appeal.
Finally, it has not been demonstrated that there will be a delay in hearing of the appeal. In the premises the application lacks merit. It is dismissed.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MACHAKOS this 21ST day of MARCH, 2014.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE