[2011] KEHC 564 (KLR)
The court found that the suit parcel of land originally belonged to Omondi Luvuya, the husband of both Femina Kasaya Omondi and Queen Iminza. Despite a prior court order directing equal subdivision of the land between the two widows, Femina Kasaya Omondi had herself registered as sole proprietor. The court held that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 564 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Patrick Uhuru Omondi; Objector: Queen Iminza
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 35 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection to Grant of Letters of Administration
- Outcome
- Objection upheld in part; both parties appointed joint administrators; estate to be subdivided as per court order.
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Distribution of Land, Rights of Widows, Administration of Estates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Uhuru Omondi
Petitioner
Queen Iminza
Objector
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection to Grant of Letters of Administration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner was the sole beneficiary entitled to the estate of Femina Kasaya Omondi.
- 2 Whether the objector, as a co-wife and her children, were entitled to a share of the estate.
- 3 Whether the suit parcel of land should be subdivided between the families of the deceased's widows.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the suit parcel of land originally belonged to Omondi Luvuya, the husband of both Femina Kasaya Omondi and Queen Iminza. Despite a prior court order directing equal subdivision of the land between the two widows, Femina Kasaya Omondi had herself registered as sole proprietor. The court held that the objector, as a co-wife, and her children were entitled to inherit a portion of the estate. The petitioner was not the sole beneficiary, and both parties were entitled to be appointed as joint administrators. The estate was to be distributed in accordance with the prior court order, with Queen Iminza and her children inheriting 5 acres and Patrick Uhuru Omondi and his...
Court Disposition
Objection upheld in part; both parties appointed joint administrators; estate to be subdivided as per court order.
Orders
- Patrick Uhuru Omondi and Queen Iminza are appointed joint administrators of the estate of Femina Kasaya Omondi.
- Queen Iminza (together with her children) shall inherit 5 acres of the suit parcel of land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 35 OF 1996
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF FEMINA KASAYA OMONDI ......... DECEASED
PATRICK UHURU OMONDI.........................................................................................PETITIONER
V E R S U S
QUEEN IMINZA...............................................................................................................OBJECTOR
R U L I N G
Femina Kasaya Omondi, the deceased to whose estate these proceedings relate died on 21st August 1991. On 23rd January 1996, Patrick Uhuru Omondi (the petitioner) petitioned this court to be granted letters of administration intestate to administer the estate of the deceased. In his petition, the petitioner listed himself as the only beneficiary of the deceased. The only asset stated to belong to the estate of the deceased was a parcel of land registered as L.R. No. Kakamega/Lumakanda/842 (hereinafter referred to as the suit parcel of land). This parcel of land measures 4. 6 hectares or 11. 3 acres.
When Queen Iminza (the objector) became aware that the petitioner had petitioned this court to be granted letters of administration intestate, she filed objection challenging the assertion by the petitioner that he was the only beneficiary of the estate of the deceased. She accused the petitioner of failing to disclose the fact that she was a widow to Omondi Luvuya (deceased) and co-wife of Femina Kasaya Omondi, and therefore entitled to be declared as a beneficiary of the estate of the deceased together with her children, namely, Joshua Ojundo Omondi, Wycliffe Daima Omondi, Julia Libese Omondi, Edward Omondi and Godwin Omondi. She further stated that the petitioner failed to disclose to the court the fact that she was a residing on the suit parcel of land. In response to the objection, the petitioner, while conceding that the objector was a widow to Omondi Luvuya (deceased), he denied that the parcel of land that is the subject of the succession proceedings belonged to the said Omondi Luvuya (deceased). He reiterated that the parcel of land in question belonged to Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased) who was his mother. He was emphatic that, the objector, as a co-wife of Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased), had no right over the suit parcel of land. On her part, it the objector’s case that Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased), during her lifetime, had herself fraudulently registered as the sole owner of the suit parcel of land even after the court had ruled that the particular parcel of land be inherited jointly by herself and Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased) as the widows of Omondi Luvuya (deceased).
During the hearing of the objection, this court heard oral evidence adduced by the petitioner and the objector. After carefully evaluating the said evidence, it was clear that Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased) had herself registered solely as the proprietor of the suit parcel of land despite the fact that the District Magistrate at Butali in Land Succession Case No.26 of 1980 had ruled that Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased) and Queen Iminza subdivide the suit parcel of land so that both of them could each inherit half a share. The basis of the petitioner’s case was that the suit parcel of land belonged to Femina Kasaya Omondi (deceased). From the evidence adduced, it was clear that the suit parcel of land initially belonged to Omondi Luvuya (deceased) the husband of both Femina Kasaya Omondi and Queen Iminza. This was before Femina Kasaya Omondi had herself registered as the sole owner of the suit parcel of land despite the fact that there was a court order that directed that the suit parcel of land be subdivided equally between Femina Kasaya Omondi and Queen Iminza as the widows of Omondi Luvuya (deceased).
In the premises therefore, it is clear that the objector has a case when she states that she is entitled, firstly, to be a joint administrator of the estate of the deceased, and secondly, to inherit a portion of the suit property that comprised the sole estate of the deceased. This court therefore appoints Patrick Uhuru Omondi and Queen Iminza to be the administrators of the estate of the deceased. The grant of letters of administration issued to the two is hereby confirmed on the following terms:
1. Queen Iminza (together with her children) shall inherit the portion of the suit parcel of land measuring 5 acres.
2. Patrick Uhuru Omondi (together with his siblings) shall inherit the remainder of the said parcel of land.
3. The petitioner shall pay the costs of the objection proceedings to the objector.
DATED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011
L. KIMARU
J U D G E