[2018] KEHC 6704 (KLR)
The High Court determined that the dispute in question, being one of occupation, use, and title to land, falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as per Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011. The practice directions issued by the Chief Justice further clarify that appeals from magistrates' courts on such matters should be heard by the Environment and Land Court. Consequently, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal, and the proper course is to transfer the matter to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 6704 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Gichuri Kariuki; Appellant: Christopher Weruwa Wahome; Respondent: Wangui Kariuki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2018
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 4 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
- Outcome
- Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
- Judges
- J Ngaah
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court, Transfer of Cases, Land Occupation Disputes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Gichuri Kariuki
Appellant
Christopher Weruwa Wahome
Appellant
Wangui Kariuki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal relating to occupation, use, or title to land.
- 2 Whether the appeal should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that the dispute in question, being one of occupation, use, and title to land, falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as per Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011. The practice directions issued by the Chief Justice further clarify that appeals from magistrates' courts on such matters should be heard by the Environment and Land Court. Consequently, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal, and the proper course is to transfer the matter to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
Court Disposition
Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
Orders
- The file is to be transferred to the Environment and Land Court forthwith for hearing and determination or for such other directions or orders as that court will deem fit to issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment