[2005] KEHC 1660 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate special circumstances or overwhelming chances of success in the appeal. The grounds advanced, including alleged illness and possible delay, were unsupported by evidence and did not meet the legal threshold for granting bail pending appeal. The court emphasized...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1660 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Kamau Mwaura; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 88 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Bail Pending Appeal Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Special Circumstances, Overwhelming Chances of Success, Treatment of Prisoners
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Kamau Mwaura
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Bail Pending Appeal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has demonstrated special circumstances to warrant bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether there are overwhelming chances of success in the appeal to justify granting bail.
- 3 Whether the appellant's alleged illness constitutes a sufficient ground for bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate special circumstances or overwhelming chances of success in the appeal. The grounds advanced, including alleged illness and possible delay, were unsupported by evidence and did not meet the legal threshold for granting bail pending appeal. The court emphasized that arrangements exist for the treatment of prisoners and that any irregularities in the trial can only be addressed in the substantive appeal. Consequently, both the application for bail pending appeal and for stay of execution were dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
- Application for stay of execution is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Criminal Appeal 88 of 2005
PAUL KAMAU MWAURA ……………………..……………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………….……………………..RESPONDENT
RULING ON BAIL APPLICATION
The appellant has applied for bail under Section 356 and 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code Cap 75.
The Appellant seeks orders to be admitted to bail pending appeal and that in the meantime, Stay of Execution be granted pending appeal.
The application is supported by Affidavit of his advocate on the grounds that the appeal has high chances of success and Appellant is ready to attend court whenever required and that the health of appellant is deteriorating in Manyani due to congestion in the prison. That the offences convicted on are bailable and there is likelihood of delay in determining this appeal.
The charge sheet shows charges under Section 357 (a) Penal code, Section 349 Penal Code, Section 353 Penal code Sec. 357 (a) Penal code Sec. 350 (1) Penal code forging Sec. 389 Penal Code. All the counts are eight.
It is to be noted that the appellant is serving a sentence imposed by a court of law.
Whereas he has a right of appeal, I have examined the grounds of appeal and find no overwhelming chances.
In case of illness there are arrangements for the treatment of prisoners in every prison. In any case no evidence of the alleged illness is exhibited.
Any irregularity in trial proceedings can be addressed only in the appeal and is not an overwhelming ground to grant bail. No authorities were referred but it is trite law that to warrant bail pending appeal, there must be special circumstances raised by the applicant and there must be overwhelming chances of success.
The accused is convicted on 8 counts. We cannot say there is serious illness without seeing medical opinion. For these reasons I decline to grant bail. The application is dismissed. The application for Stay of Execution is rejected. The fines can always be refunded in case of success in appeal.
Delivered and dated at Mombasa this 26th day of September 2005
J. KHAMINWA
J U D G E