[2010] KEHC 2376 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence of the complainant and corroborating witnesses was clear and consistent in establishing that the appellant was found in possession of the stolen cattle shortly after the theft. The appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his possession of the animals. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2376 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Kiprop Korir; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 100 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stock Theft, Possession of Stolen Property, Criminal Evidence, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Kiprop Korir
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence adduced was sufficient to sustain a conviction for stock theft.
- 2 Whether the appellant gave a satisfactory explanation for being found in possession of the stolen cattle.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence of the complainant and corroborating witnesses was clear and consistent in establishing that the appellant was found in possession of the stolen cattle shortly after the theft. The appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his possession of the animals. The court applied the legal principle that unexplained possession of recently stolen property raises a presumption of guilt. The trial court's conviction was therefore justified, and the sentence imposed was not excessive given the circumstances and value of the stolen stock. The appeal was found to lack merit and was dismissed in its entirety.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.
- The conviction and sentence of five years' imprisonment are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII Criminal Appeal 100 of 2009
BETWEEN
PAUL KIPROP KORIR ……………………....................................…. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ……………………………….................................................... RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from original conviction and sentence of the SRM’s court at Kilgoris in
criminal case No. 871 of 2006 - W.N. Kaberia, RM)
JUDGMENT
The appellant was charged with stealing stock contrary tosection 278of thePenal Code.The particulars of the offence were that on the night of 21st and 22nd October 2006 at Mophir village in Transmara District of theRiftValleyProvincejointly with another stole 10 heads of cattle valued at Kshs. 60,000/= the property ofDaniel Ole Kiramba.
The appellant was tried, convicted and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.
Being aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, the
appellant preferred an appeal to this court.He stated that there
was insufficient evidence to warrant a conviction.
The prosecution evidence briefly stated was as hereunder:
Daniel Ole Kiramba, PW2,testified that when he woke up on the morning of22nd October 2006, he realized that his ten cows had been stolen.Together with another people they followed the foot prints up to a place known as Kapalecho.They did not find the animals and returned back home.On the following day they continued with the search.They went to Itembe market in Bomet District where they found the animals with the appellant and one other person known asWesley Kiplangat Cheruiyotwho was the appellant’s co-accused before the trial court.PW2 was withBernard Kiplangat Arap Koech, PW3who is an Assistant Chief andInspector Alexander Njagi, PW4.
The evidence of PW2 was well corroborated by that of PW3 and PW4.
In his statement of defence, the appellant testified that on23rd October 2006he went to sell his father’s cattle at Chepuony market.After he sold the cattle he boarded a vehicle to go back home.On the way the vehicle broke down and so he decided to alight and walk home.
At around9. 00 p.m.on his way home he was stopped by three people who assaulted him.He lost consciousness and when he regained it three days later, he found himself at a police cell in Bomet.He denied having committed the offence.
Photographs of the recovered animals were produced before the trial court byPolice Constable Charles Rotich, PW1. The evidence of PW2, PW3 and PW4 was clear and consistent that the stolen animals were recovered from the appellant and his accomplice.They did not give any satisfactory explanation as to how they came to be in possession of the stolen animals.
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the appellant’s conviction was warranted.The sentence that was handed down is not harsh, considering the number of animals that had been stolen.This appeal lacks merit and it is dismissed in its entirety.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISII THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2010.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.
22/3/2010
Before D. Musinga, J.
Mobisa – cc
Mr. Mutai for the Respondent
Appellant present
Court:Judgment delivered in open court on22nd March, 2010.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.