[2019] KEHC 341 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 341 (KLR)

The court found that the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit, as the memorandum of appeal was lodged on 9th January 2018, less than thirty days after the judgment. The trial magistrate erred in failing to award damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities, as evidence of injury was adduced through...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 341 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Paul Mageka Nyachoti; Respondent: Tombe Tea Factory Co. Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 1 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed in part; judgment of lower court reviewed and damages awarded as specified
Judges
EM Muchoki
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Quantum of Damages, Apportionment of Liability, Special Damages
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Personal Injury Quantum of Damages Apportionment of Liability Special Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Mageka Nyachoti

Appellant

Tombe Tea Factory Co. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial magistrate erred in failing to award damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenities despite evidence of personal injuries.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to special damages for the medical report and towing charges.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit, as the memorandum of appeal was lodged on 9th January 2018, less than thirty days after the judgment. The trial magistrate erred in failing to award damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities, as evidence of injury was adduced through the appellant's testimony and a medical report produced by consent. The court held that the appellant was entitled to general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities, as well as special damages for the medical report and towing charges, both of which were specifically pleaded and strictly proved. The quantum of general damages was set at Kshs. 130,000, and special...

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part; judgment of lower court reviewed and damages awarded as specified

Orders

  • Liability apportioned at 80:20% in favour of the appellant against the respondent.
  • Material damage awarded at Kshs. 174,580.