[2015] KEELC 357 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiffs had established, through documentary evidence and expert testimony, that the transfer of the suit property from the deceased to the 1st Defendant was effected using forged documents. The Defendants failed to contest the claim or provide any evidence to the contrary. The court was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELC 357 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Paul Maina Kinguru; Plaintiff: John Kabuga Kinguru (suing as the administrators of the estate of Jane Nyawira Kinguru-deceased); Defendant: Lucy Sialo Nayoki Tofani; Defendant: Kessler Maria Kavemba; Defendant: Land Registrar Mombasa
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 111 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' suit allowed as prayed.
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Transfer, Land Title, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Maina Kinguru
Plaintiff
John Kabuga Kinguru (suing as the administrators of the estate of Jane Nyawira Kinguru-deceased)
Plaintiff
Lucy Sialo Nayoki Tofani
Defendant
Kessler Maria Kavemba
Defendant
Land Registrar Mombasa
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of the suit property from the deceased to the 1st Defendant was fraudulent, illegal, null and void.
- 2 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that the transfer and any subsequent transfers were invalid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiffs had established, through documentary evidence and expert testimony, that the transfer of the suit property from the deceased to the 1st Defendant was effected using forged documents. The Defendants failed to contest the claim or provide any evidence to the contrary. The court was satisfied that the Plaintiffs' mother never transferred the suit property to the 1st Defendant, and that the subsequent registration and transfer were fraudulent, illegal, and void. Consequently, the Plaintiffs were entitled to the reliefs sought, including a declaration that the transfer and any subsequent transfers were invalid.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' suit allowed as prayed.
Orders
- Declaration that the transfer of the suit property from the deceased to the 1st Defendant and any subsequent transfers were fraudulent, illegal, null and void.
- The Plaintiffs' Plaint dated 13th June, 2014 is allowed as prayed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MALINDI
ELC CIVIL CASE NO.111 OF 2014
PAUL MAINA KINGURU
JOHN KABUGA KINGURU (SUING AS THE
ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF
JANE NYAWIRA KINGURU-DECEASED)..................................................PLAINTIFFS
=VERSUS=
1. LUCY SIALO NAYOKI TOFANI
2. KESSLER MARIA KAVEMBA
3. LAND REGISTRAR MOMBASA........................................................DEFENDANTS
J U D G M E N T
Introduction:
The Plaintiffs have averred in their Plaint dated 13th June 2014 that at all material times, the deceased was the registered owner of portion number 2056 (original No.418/13) Malindi; that in March 2006, the 1st Defendant purportedly transferred the suit property to the 2nd Defendant.
The Plaintiffs are seeking for an order declaring that the transfer of the suit property from the deceased to the 1st Defendant and any other subsequent transfers were fraudulent, illegal, null and void.
Although the Defendants were served with the Summons to Enter Appearance and the Plaint, they neither entered appearance nor filed a Defence.
The Plaintiffs' case:
The 1st Plaintiff, PW1, informed the court that the suit property belonged to their late father who purchased it way back in 1974 vide an Indenture dated 8th July 1974. The 1st Plaintiff produced in evidence the said Indenture and the Letters of Administration.
It was the evidence of PW1 that in March, 2006, he learnt that the 1st Defendant had fraudulently transferred the suit property to herself using forged documents purportedly executed by the deceased, Jane Nyawira Kaguru, who was the administrator of their late father's estate.
PW1 produced a report by the document examiner who confirmed that the Transfer documents were indeed forged.
Analysis and findings:
PW1 produced in evidence the certificate of confirmation of a grant in respect to the Estate of the late Jane Nyawira Kinguru which shows the suit property was one of the assets that belonged to the Estate of the deceased. An Indenture registered on 18th July, 1974 in favour of the Plaintiffs' father was also produced in evidence.
The entries in the Certificate of Title shows that the Plaintiffs' mother was registered as the proprietor of the suit property on 2nd November 1992 before the land was subdivided and transferred to the 1st Defendant in the year 2007.
PW1 informed the court that the 1st Defendant was a family friend; that the 1st Defendant bought shares in parcel of land MG2 and not the suit property and that the transfer of the suit property to the 1st Defendant was fraudulent.
Having considered the exhibits and the evidence by PW1, I am convinced that the Plaintiffs' mother never transferred the suit property to the 1st Defendant.
In the circumstances, I find and hold that the Plaintiffs have proved their case on a balance of probabilities.
For those reasons, I allow the Plaintiffs' Plaint dated 13th June, 2014 as prayed.
Dated and delivered in Malindi this 10th day of July 2015.
O. A. Angote
Judge